Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan No. 59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019 /PN Mdn)

Abstract

Misuse cases that occur in village fund management are carried out in various modus operandi, such as drafting a budget fee above the market price then paying based on another agreement, temporarily borrowing village funds by transferring funds to a personal account and then not returning it. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is: How is the Criminal Law regulated for Village Fund Corruption Crimes, What is the process of monitoring Village Funds in an effort to prevent Corruption Crimes in Batu Bara Regency, How are Judges' Legal Considerations in Handing Down Decisions on Village Fund Corruption Crimes in Medan District Court Decisions? No.59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Mdn. The research method used is descriptive analysis which leads to normative juridical legal research, namely research carried out by referring to legal norms, namely researching library materials or secondary materials. Secondary data by processing data from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research show that the criminal case of corruption in Suka Jaya Village Funds, Tanjung Tire Sub-district, Batu Bara Regency, was the Village Fund Budget which had been disbursed by the defendant Arifin as Head of Suka Jaya Village, Tanjung Tire Sub-District together with Kamariah as Treasurer of Suka Jaya Village, but in carrying out activities using village funds without the participation of other village officials including the Village Treasurer. Accountability for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption in village funds in the District Court's decision. Corruption No.59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Mdn is that Arifin was sentenced to prison for 6 (six) years and 6 months and a fine of IDR 200,000,000 (two hundred million rupiah) and compensation of IDR. 599,524,788,- (five hundred ninety nine million five hundred twenty four thousand seven hundred eighty eight rupiah) if it cannot be fulfilled within one month then the defendant's property will be confiscated and if it is not there then it will be replaced with a sentence of 3 years and 3 months. The basis for the judge's consideration in handing down a decision against the defendant in the District Court's decision. Corruption No.59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Mdn means that the defendant's actions were in accordance with the legal facts revealed at trial.