Tinjauan Yuridis Pasal 63 Ayat (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dalam Kaitannya dengan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris yang Telah Berumur 25 Tahun Atau Lebih di Kota Medan
Juridical Review of Article 63 Paragraph (5) of Law Number 2 of 2014 Concerning Amendments To Law Number 30 Of 2004 Concerning The Office of Notary Regarding the Submission oof Notarial Protocols Aged 25 Years or More in Medan City

Date
2024Author
Simamora, Yosua Leo Ezra Roito
Advisor(s)
Purba, Hasim
Suprayitno
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The storage of notarial protocols that have not been submitted from notaries to the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) does not comply with the provisions of Article 63 paragraph (5) of the UUJN, which mandates that notarial protocols aged 25 years or more must be submitted to the MPD. This study addresses the following issues: (1) What are the responsibilities of notaries regarding notarial protocols aged 25 years or more (2) How is Article 63 paragraph (5) of law Number 2 of2014 concerning Amendments to law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary applied in the process of submitting notarial protocols and (3) What are the implications if a nota,y fails to submit notarial protocols aged 25 years or more as regulated in Article 63 paragraph (5) of law Number 2 of 2014.
This research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained from interviews with notaries in Medan City and legal document studies. The analysis was conducted qualitatively to examine notarial protocol issues, integrate legal theories with field data, and draw deductive conclusions.
The results indicate that notarial protocols aged 25 years or more, as regulated in Article 63 paragraph (5) of the UUJN, must be submitted to the MPD according to its authority under Article 70(e) of the UUJN. The implementation involves an inventory mechanism, preparation of protocol lists, and submission minutes. However, challenges arise due to limited storage space, damaged protocols, incomplete documents, and lack of coordination. Failure to submit these protocols may result in administrative sanctions under Article 85 of the UUJN, including verbal or written warnings, tempora,y suspension, dismissal with or without honor, which could affect the notary's credibility and professionalism.
Collections
- Master Theses (Notary) [2196]