Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPurba, Hasim
dc.contributor.advisorSuprayitno
dc.contributor.authorSimamora, Yosua Leo Ezra Roito
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T02:10:57Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T02:10:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/101211
dc.description.abstractThe storage of notarial protocols that have not been submitted from notaries to the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) does not comply with the provisions of Article 63 paragraph (5) of the UUJN, which mandates that notarial protocols aged 25 years or more must be submitted to the MPD. This study addresses the following issues: (1) What are the responsibilities of notaries regarding notarial protocols aged 25 years or more (2) How is Article 63 paragraph (5) of law Number 2 of2014 concerning Amendments to law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary applied in the process of submitting notarial protocols and (3) What are the implications if a nota,y fails to submit notarial protocols aged 25 years or more as regulated in Article 63 paragraph (5) of law Number 2 of 2014. This research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained from interviews with notaries in Medan City and legal document studies. The analysis was conducted qualitatively to examine notarial protocol issues, integrate legal theories with field data, and draw deductive conclusions. The results indicate that notarial protocols aged 25 years or more, as regulated in Article 63 paragraph (5) of the UUJN, must be submitted to the MPD according to its authority under Article 70(e) of the UUJN. The implementation involves an inventory mechanism, preparation of protocol lists, and submission minutes. However, challenges arise due to limited storage space, damaged protocols, incomplete documents, and lack of coordination. Failure to submit these protocols may result in administrative sanctions under Article 85 of the UUJN, including verbal or written warnings, tempora,y suspension, dismissal with or without honor, which could affect the notary's credibility and professionalism.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectNotaryen_US
dc.subjectNotarial Protocolsen_US
dc.subjectRegional Supervisory Councilen_US
dc.titleTinjauan Yuridis Pasal 63 Ayat (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dalam Kaitannya dengan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris yang Telah Berumur 25 Tahun Atau Lebih di Kota Medanen_US
dc.title.alternativeJuridical Review of Article 63 Paragraph (5) of Law Number 2 of 2014 Concerning Amendments To Law Number 30 Of 2004 Concerning The Office of Notary Regarding the Submission oof Notarial Protocols Aged 25 Years or More in Medan Cityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM227011006
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0003036602
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0101056502
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74102#Kenotariatan
dc.description.pages137 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record