Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSadalia, Isfenti
dc.contributor.advisorNazaruddin
dc.contributor.authorSaloko, Anindityo Aryo
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T03:32:11Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T03:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/101487
dc.description.abstractSuccess in the implementation of a construction project is seen through the accuracy in maintaining the triple constraints: cost, quality, and time. Analyzing project risk is crucial for long-term investment and project development success. It is necessary to have an analysis model for mitigating the risk due to the complexity of constructing a generator project, particularly the 45 MW PLTA (water-powered electric generator) in North Sumatra province. There is the incidence of risk that can impede its construction in the investment financial risk. The following are the risks that will be identified after measurement and analysis are done. It is found that the risk priority is the one which has to be managed first such as the management of project expenses, management of cash and flow, specification of contract detail, and difficulty in supplying the materials. These risks are managed by interpreting them and implementing risk mitigation strategies to prevent financial loss during construction. The analysis on risk mitigation shows that project expense management is the top priority, followed by cash flow management, contract detail specification, and difficulty in supplying the materials. The implementation of the research findings and risk mitigation priorities requires identifying critical processes and adopting approaches to provide alternative controls for these processes. For example, if the total cost approach is critical, then procuring PLTA materials becomes a critical process. An explorative approach, such as contracting with material suppliers to ensure timely delivery of ordered materials (with or without down payment), can be delivered according to the project schedule. Other approaches can be used for other identified critical processes. We can use the result of risk mitigation priority according to risk incidence. The mitigation implementation can be done flexibly according to further identification.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectMitigation Strategyen_US
dc.subjectDecisionen_US
dc.subjectFinancial Risken_US
dc.subjectInvestment Feasibilityen_US
dc.titleModel Analisis dan Strategi Mitigasi Risiko Keuangan dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Air (PLTA) di Wilayah Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.title.alternativeAnalytical and Strategic Model of Financial Risk Mitigation in Decision Making for Investment Feasibility of PLTA (Water Powered Electric Generator) Construction in North Sumatraen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM207007103
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0019106702
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001086008
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI61102#Magister Manajemen
dc.description.pages151 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 7. Affordable And Clean Energyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record