Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSuhaidi
dc.contributor.advisorSiahaaan, Rudy Haposan
dc.contributor.authorMumtazh, Dilla Naharul
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-26T03:34:47Z
dc.date.available2025-02-26T03:34:47Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/101630
dc.description.abstractNotaries in Indonesia and Japan have the authority to make deeds and have the liability to keep them as deed minutes as part of the Notary Protocol. Regarding the storage of the Minute of Deed in Indonesia, it is still conventional, this raises a number of problems that are closely related to the interests of the confronters as parties who need the Minute as evidence. Whereas Indonesia itself is in the era of globalization by being able to take advantage of the great potential of information and communication with paperless electronic media, such as Japan, which stores the Minute of Deed in 2 (two) ways, namely conventionally and electronically, which has perfect evidentiary power, storage in this way makes it easier for various parties, both from the parties concerned and notaries and from the Ministry of Justice. The problems raised in this research relate to the authority of Notary in terms of carrying out his position to make a Deed to store it as a Minute Deed in Indonesia and Japan, the form of implementation of storing the Minute Deed of Notary in Indonesia and Japan, and the application of digital society 5.0 in Japan in terms of storing the Minute Deed of Notary, which can be applied in Indonesia in the future. This research generally aims to examine and analyze the form of storage of the Minute of Deed, which is carried out conventionally and electronically. Given that technological progress has been so rapid that it can no longer be avoided, and the use of technology is more effective, efficient, and low-cost for humans in doing their work. The research method used in this writing is normative juridical in nature because it is analyzed as the basis of research that positions the law as a system of norms carried out to analyze and assess positive law with a comparative approach and statutory approach between the laws of two countries, namely Japanese Notary Law No. 53 of 1908 jo. Japanese Notary Law No. 74 of 2011 with Law No. 2 of 2014 jo. Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary. The result of the research is that Indonesia must learn from Japan to improve the storage system of the Minute of Deed and the need for infrastructure that supports the creation and storage of electronic and conventional Minute of Deeds, as well as harmonizing existing regulations before implementing a conventional and electronic notary system as in Japan.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectMinuta Aktaen_US
dc.subjectConventionalen_US
dc.subjectElectronicen_US
dc.subjectJapanen_US
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_US
dc.titleKewajiban Notaris Dalam Hal Penyimpanan Minuta Akta (Studi Perbandingan Antara Negara Jepang dan Indonesia)en_US
dc.title.alternativeNotary's Liability for Keeping the Deed Minutes (A Study on the Comparision between Japan and Indonesia)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM237011007
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013076207
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0104026702
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74102#Kenotariatan
dc.description.pages165 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 4. Quality Educationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record