Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris terhadap Pemalsuan Pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa (Studi Putusan No. 898/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt)
Legal Responsibility of Notaries in Cases of Forgery in the making of the minutes of extraordinary general meeting of shareholders

Date
2024Author
Purba, Sarah Putri Febriyanti
Advisor(s)
Purba, Hasim
Suprayitno
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Notaries are responsible for the deeds they make, especially for those
containing false information that may cause harm to other parties. In the Criminal
Case Decision Number 898/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Brt, a Notary committed the criminal
act of aiding or instructing the placement of false information in the Minutes of the
Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. The issues discussed in this thesis
are: how the legal responsibility of the Notary in relation to the forgery of the Minutes
of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders based on the West Jakarta
District Court Decision Number 898/Pid. B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, the legal consequences of
the forgery of the deed made by the notary related to the Minutes of the Extraordinary
General Meeting of Shareholders based on the West Jakarta District Court Decision
Number 898/Pid. B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, and the legal consideration analysis of the judge
in the West Jakarta District Court Decision Number 898/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt.
The method used in this research is normative juridical, with a descriptive-
analytical approach. The data collection technique used is literature study (library
The results of the research indicate that the legal responsibility of a Notary in
criminal acts of placing false information into an authentic deed is subject to Article
266 paragraph (1) of the Penal Code Jo Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Penal Code.
The legal consequences of forging the Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting
of Shareholders made by a Notary are that the Notary is subject to Article 266
paragraph (1) of the Penal Code Jo Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Penal Code due to
the harm caused to the parties. The analysis of the Criminal Case Decision Number
898/Pid. B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Brt shows that the judge, in delivering the verdict, considered
the evidence and facts demonstrating that the Notary had been proven to commit a
criminal act. This research provides insights into the importance of applying the
principle of caution by Notaries in performing their duties and functions in making
authentic deeds.
Collections
- Master Theses (Notary) [2196]