Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSari, Raina Linda
dc.contributor.advisorIrsad
dc.contributor.authorLubis, Fahrurrozi
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T06:41:21Z
dc.date.available2025-05-08T06:41:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/103721
dc.description.abstractOne of the highest potential regional tax revenues is PBB (Land and Building Tax) and BPHTB (Acquisition Duty Of Right On Land And Building). The PBB and BPHTB revenues of Medan prior to 2012 both administration and tax collection, were done by the central government, aided by the Medan Municipality. Since 2012 PBB and BPHTB have become regional tax in order to decrease regional government dependency on the central government in regional expenditures. It is required to have the change in regional government in the pre- transition period of 2002-2011 and the post-transition period of 2012-2021. This research is to find out the level of activity, the contribution of PBB and BPHTB revenues, regional independency ratio, and tax ratio in the pre- and post-transition period. The research uses secondary data, and the time of doing the research was 2002-2021, using the analysis of effectiveness, contribution, regional independency ratio, tax ratio, and paired sample t-test. The result of the research gives the explanation about the condition of effectiveness and contribution of PBB and BPHTB revenues of Medan which shows that the effective development pattern of PBB and PBHTB tends to be up and down in the last few years with the criteria of fairly effective and similar to the contribution of PBB which is very good and BPHTB which is moderately good. The development of the level of independency with participative relationship increases each year, and even though tax ratio increases each year, it does not reach three percent. The result of paired t-test shows that there is significant difference in the effectiveness and the contribution of PBB, the contribution of BPHTB independency ratio, and tax ratio before and after they become regional tax, and there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of BPHTB before and after it becomes regional tax.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectPBBen_US
dc.subjectBPHTBen_US
dc.subjecteffectivenessen_US
dc.subjectcontributionen_US
dc.subjectregional independency ratioen_US
dc.subjectregional tax ratioen_US
dc.subjectpaired sample t-testen_US
dc.titleKomparasi Penerimaan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan (PBB) dengan Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) Sebelum dan Sesudah Masa Peralihan serta Peranannya terhadap Penerimaan Perpajakan Kota Medanen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparison of PBB (Land and Building Tax) with BPHTB (Acquisition Duty of Right on Land And Building) in The Pre- and Post-Transition Period and Their Role in The Tax Revenue of Medanen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM207018007
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0007096304
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0003057103
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI60101#Ilmu Ekonomi
dc.description.pages124 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 8. Decent Work And Economic Growthen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record