Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSuyatno
dc.contributor.advisorPasaribu, Endi Taris
dc.contributor.authorBatubara, Rio Nurdiansyah
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T03:25:30Z
dc.date.available2025-06-25T03:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104601
dc.description.abstractBackground: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a distinct and aggressive breast cancer subtype that lacks estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, making it challenging to treat. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of TNBC management, with platinum-based and non-platinum regimens commonly used. Comparative data on the effectiveness of these regimens in TNBC patients is limited. Objective: This study aims to compare the chemotherapy response between platinum-based and non-platinum regimens in patients with triple negative breast cancer at H. Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan. Methods: This observational analytic study employed a retrospective cohort design including 60 TNBC patients treated at H. Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan. Patients were divided into two groups: 30 received platinum-based regimens and 30 received non-platinum regimens. Chemotherapy response was assessed based on RECIST criteria, categorizing outcomes as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). Statistical analysis was performed to compare response rates between the two groups. Results: A significant difference was found in complete response (CR) and stable disease (SD) rates between the two regimens. Platinum-based regimens were more effective in achieving CR (33.3%), while non-platinum regimens were more frequently associated with SD (23.3%). No significant differences were observed in partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) rates. Most TNBC patients at H. Adam Malik General Hospital were in the 40–60 year age group (66.7%), with a mean age of 45.3 ± 8.9 years. All patients were female, and the most common histological subtype was Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (83.3%).Patients receiving platinum-based regimens showed the following response distribution: CR 33.3%, PR 53.3%, SD 6.6%, and PD 6.6%. In the non-platinum group: CR 16.7%, PR 40%, SD 23.3%, and PD 20% Conclusion: Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens provide a significantly better complete response compared to non-platinum regimens in TNBC patients, while non-platinum regimens are more likely to result in stable disease. These findings support the use of platinum-based regimens as a preferred option in this population, with ongoing monitoring for toxicity. Keyword: triple negative breast cancer, chemotherapy, platinum-based regimen, non-platinum regimen, response, clinical outcomeen_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.subjectTriple negative breast canceren_US
dc.subjectChemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectPlatinum-based regimenen_US
dc.subjectNon-platinum regimenen_US
dc.subjectClinical outcomeen_US
dc.titlePerbandingan Respon Kemoterapi antara Regimen Kemoterapi Berbasis Platinum dengan Regimen Non Platinum pada Triple Negative Breast Cancer di Rsup H. Adam Malik Medanen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparison of Chemotherapy Response Between Platinum-Based and Non-Platinum Regimens in Triple Negative Breast Cancer at H. Adam Malik General Hospital, Medanen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM227041009
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN8944150022
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0003118703
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI11103#Ilmu Kedokteran Klinis
dc.description.pages73 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 3. Good Health And Well Beingen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record