• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Pemberhentian Direktur Melalui RUPS Luar Biasa Tanpa Hak Bela dari Direktur (Studi Putusan Nomor 290/Pdt/2023/PT.Dps)

    Dismissal of Director Through Extraordinary GMS Without the Right of Defense from the Director (Study of Decision Number 290/Pdt/2023/PT.Dps)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (537.9Kb)
    Fulltext (1.080Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Purba, Ilham Wandinata
    Advisor(s)
    Sunarmi
    Lubis, Tri Murti
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In the process of dismissing directors, there is often a neglect of the defense rights owned by the director, causing injustice. With this background, the formulation of the problems to be discussed are, How is the mechanism for dismissing a director based on Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, How is the validity of dismissing a director through an Extraordinary GMS without the right to defense from the director, How is the consideration of the panel of judges in decision Number 290/Pdt/2023/PT.Dps related to the dismissal of a director through an Extraordinary GMS without the right to defense from the director. The writing of this thesis uses a normative juridical method, namely research that is focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. The research method used in this writing is the literature method and uses qualitative analysis. The data used in this research is secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, tertiary legal materials obtained by library research data collection techniques. The results showed that First, the mechanism for dismissing the director can be through the GMS, namely the Annual GMS and Extraordinary GMS. Second, the dismissal of the director without the right of defense from the director violates the provisions of Article 105 paragraph (2) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies which regulates the granting of defense rights, so the GMS decision becomes invalid because the action is illegal. Third, the Panel of Judges in its consideration considered that the procedure for dismissal of the Director must be carried out in accordance with Article 105 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, namely providing an opportunity for the Director to defend himself and providing clear reasons for dismissal in the GMS decision. With this case, it is hoped that it can serve as a guideline to shareholders and the board of commissioners in carrying out the process of dismissing directors through an Extraordinary GMS must follow the applicable laws and regulations.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104881
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Theses [3144]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV