• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum oleh Hakim terhadap Penjatuhan Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Ijazah (Studi Putusan PN No.383/Pid.B/2021/PN Tsm dan Putusan MA No.4594K/Pid.Sus/2022)

    Analysis of Legal Considerations by Judges on the Imposition of Punishment in the Crime of Forgery of Diplomas (Study of District Court Decision Number 383/Pid.B/2021/PN TSM and Supreme Court Decision Number 4594K/Pid.Sus/2022)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (766.9Kb)
    Fulltext (1.323Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Tindaon, Tania Laurensia
    Advisor(s)
    Suwarto
    Trisna, Wessy
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The crime of diploma forgery is a disturbing phenomenon that threatens the integrity of the education system and legal order in Indonesia. This study aims to examine how the criminal offense of diploma forgery is regulated under Indonesian criminal law, how criminal liability is imposed on perpetrators of diploma forgery in Indonesia, and how judges consider legal factors when imposing criminal penalties in cases of diploma forgery, using the case study of District Court Decision No. 383/Pid. B/2021/PN Tsm and Supreme Court Decision No. 4594K/Pid.Sus/2022. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a case approach. The regulation of criminal acts of diploma forgery is stipulated in Articles 263-264 of the Criminal Code (KUHP Lama), Articles 67-69 of Law No. 20 of 2003 on the National Education System, Article 272 of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code (New KUHP). Criminal liability of the perpetrator is based on the fulfillment of the elements of unlawfulness, capacity to be held liable, and the presence of intent (mens rea), without any justifying or excusing grounds as provided for in Article 44 of the KUHP. The legal considerations by the Judge in Supreme Court Decision No. 4594K/Pid.Sus/2022 are more comprehensive in assessing the trial facts compared to the legal considerations by the Panel of Judges in the Tasikmalaya District Court Decision, which was deemed less meticulous in considering the entire evidence and more focused on a specific aspect, namely expert testimony. This study concludes that differences in the assessment of evidence and the application of the law by judges at different levels of the judiciary can lead to disparity in decisions, and emphasizes the importance of the judge's carefulness and depth of analysis in deciding cases of diploma forgery. Keywords: Diploma Forgery, Judicial Considerations, Court Decisions, Criminal Code, National Education System Law.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104917
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Theses [3144]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV