Studi Pembobotan ROC dan CRITIC pada Metode OCRA dalam Pemilihan Guru Kompeten (Studi Kasus: SMPN 26 Batam)

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth insight into the weighting methods of ROC (Rank Order Centroid) and CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) within the OCRA (Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis) method for multi-criteria decision-making in selecting competent teachers at SMP Negeri 26 Batam. Teacher assessment is based on four primary indicators: personal competence, pedagogical competence, professional competence, and social competence. The ROC method deter- mines weights based on the ranking of criteria priority, reflecting the decision-maker’s preferences. Meanwhile, the CRITIC method assigns weights by considering data variability and inter-criteria relationships, resulting in a more objective data represen- tation. These two weighting techniques are then processed using the OCRA method to determine the ranking of competent teachers. OCRA operates by directly comparing the maximum and minimum values within the dataset to generate rankings. The research findings indicate that, based on the ROC-OCRA combination, Teacher H ranks first, whereas the CRITIC-OCRA combination places Teacher B in the top position. The rank difference analysis using the Wilcoxon test yields a Z-value of 0.000 and a p-value of 1.000, indicating that the ranking differences follow a balanced pattern.