| dc.contributor.advisor | Kamello, Tan | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Harianto, Dedi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Milala, Cintia Vanessa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-10T08:20:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-10T08:20:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/105214 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Througout the years, financing agreements with fiduciary guarantees as collateral have encountered problems in their execution. One of the issues that arises is the arbitrary actions of creditors in forcibly seizing fiduciary collateral. The problem formulation in this thesis is as follows: How has the implementation of fiduciary guarantee execution changed after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019; How is the principle of good faith applied to provide legal protection for debtors in the fiduciary guarantee execution process after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019; How do judges analyze the existence of the principle of good faith in the fiduciary guarantee execution process after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 in the District Court Decision Number 57/Pdt.G/2022.
The method used in this thesis is the normative juridical research method, which is a scientific research procedure to determine the truth based on the logic of legal science from its normative side related to the issues being studied; this research is descriptive in nature. The research was conducted through a legislative approach related to the legal issues presented. In addition to the legislative approach, this thesis also employs a case approach, with the data analysis method being qualitative.
The research findings reveal that Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 alters the procedural order in the execution of fiduciary guarantees, meaning that the fiduciary right holder or creditor cannot immediately execute on their own (parate execution) but must submit an execution fiat to the District Court if there are issues regarding default and the debtor is unwilling to voluntarily surrender. The principle of good faith is very important to ensure that the creditor does not act arbitrarily, and the debtor receives appropriate legal protection. The PN Decision No. 57/Pdt.G/2022/PN Bls is in line with the MK Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, which places the principle of good faith as a fundamental principle in the execution of fiduciary guarantees. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | id | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Universitas Sumatera Utara | en_US |
| dc.subject | Good Faith Principle | en_US |
| dc.subject | Execution | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fiduciary Guarantee | en_US |
| dc.title | Asas Itikad Baik dalam Proses Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan MK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/PDT.G/2022/PN Bls) | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | The Good Faith Principle in the Fiduciary Guarantee Execution Process After Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (An Analysis of Decision Number 57/PDT.G/2022/PN Bls) | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.identifier.nim | NIM200200165 | |
| dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0021046206 | |
| dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0020086905 | |
| dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum | |
| dc.description.pages | 182 Pages | en_US |
| dc.description.type | Skripsi Sarjana | en_US |
| dc.subject.sdgs | SDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutions | en_US |