Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorZahedi
dc.contributor.advisorPutri, Mimmy Sari Syah
dc.contributor.authorRambe, Namira
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-14T02:12:06Z
dc.date.available2025-07-14T02:12:06Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/105334
dc.description.abstractStunting has serious impacts on children’s health and, in the long term, affects the quality of human resources, particularly in countries with high stunting rates such as Indonesia. Therefore, it is crucial to reduce stunting rates through regional mapping based on the ability to manage stunting and by evaluating its contributing factors. A Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach can be applied, utilizing weight ing techniques such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Entropy, and rank ing methods including MARCOS, COPRAS, and WASPAS. The weighting results from PCA and Entropy respectively indicate that nutritional status among toddlers (C4) and the number of people living in poverty (C7) are the largest contributing factors, while food assistance (C10) and the Gini ratio (C6) are the least contributing factors. Using PCA weights in all MCDM methods, DKI Jakarta (A11) emerged as the best alterna tive, while Papua Pegunungan (A35) was ranked the lowest. Similarly, the ranking re sults using Entropy weights across all ranking methods consistently placed DKI Jakarta (A11) at the top and Papua Pegunungan (A35) at the bottom. This study found that the rankings produced by the PCA and Entropy weighting methods were identical, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.989 to 0.997, and correlations among MCDM techniques using the same weights ranging from 0.930 to 0.939.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectMCDMen_US
dc.subjectPCAen_US
dc.subjectEntropyen_US
dc.subjectWeighting Methoden_US
dc.subjectStuntingen_US
dc.titleStudi Perbandingan Performa MCDM Menggunakan PCA dan Entropy pada Perankingan Provinsi Berdasarkan Indikator Stunting di Indonesiaen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Comparative Study of MCDM Performance Using PCA and Entropy Weighting on Provincial Rankings Based on Stunting Indicators in Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210803049
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0016096101
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0029069005
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI44201#Matematika
dc.description.pages118 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 4. Quality Educationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record