Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSirait, Ningrum Natasya
dc.contributor.advisorRobert
dc.contributor.authorSembiring, Agnes Nanda Dewita Br
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-14T04:25:28Z
dc.date.available2025-07-14T04:25:28Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/105362
dc.description.abstractEconomic activities cannot be separated in human life. Economic activities are all activities carried out by humans to meet the diverse and unlimited needs of life, including the need for goods and services. To meet these human needs, business actors try to dominate the market by competing in order to provide the best products or services to their consumers. Competition requires rules because market mechanisms do not always work well. Indonesia and Singapore already have laws governing unfair business competition. The laws of the two countries both regulate the abuse of dominant position. This thesis will analyze business competition law, especially in the practice of abuse of dominant position by referring to knowledge related to business competition law, instruments for the practice of abuse of dominant position, and examples of cases of abuse of dominant position that have occurred from each country. The research method used is a normative legal method with a comparative study approach. This research is descriptive in nature by describing legal phenomena obtained from literature study. There are differences and similarities in the application of competition law between these two countries, especially in the practice of abuse of dominant position in Indonesia and Singapore in terms of laws, guidelines, and cases that have occurred in these two countries. Differences in competition law include the legal system, legal subjects, prohibited practices and sanctions stipulated in the law. In the regulation on abuse of dominant position, the differences include the characteristics of the dominant legal subject, the method of determining the relevant market, and the description of practices that are classified as abuse of dominant position. There are also some similarities in the regulation of competition law and abuse of dominant position such as the duties and authorities of law enforcement institutions, the definition of dominant position, and the concept used to categorize the subject of competition law as abusing a dominant position.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectAbuseen_US
dc.subjectPositionen_US
dc.subjectDominanten_US
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_US
dc.subjectSingaporeen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Perbandingan Praktek Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Indonesia Dengan Singapura (Studi Putusan Kppu No. 14/KPPU-L/2015 Dan Kasus CCCS SISTIC.com Pte Ltd)en_US
dc.title.alternativeComparative Analysis Of The Abuse Of Dominant Position In Competition Law Between Indonesia And Singapore (Study Of KPPU Ruling Number 14/KPPU-L/2015 And CCCS Case SISTIC.com Pte Ltd)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200405
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0017016203
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013079201
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages179 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record