• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Dalam Sengketa Merek di Indonesia (Studi pada Beberapa Kasus Sengketa Merek di Pengadilan Niaga)

    Essential Similarities in Trademark Disputes in Indonesia (A Study of Several Trademark Dispute Cases in the Commercial Court

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (823.8Kb)
    Fulltext (1.015Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Barus, Zefanya Brigitha
    Advisor(s)
    Saidin
    Azwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A brand is a sign used as an identifier for goods or services. A brand is not only a symbol and differentiator of a business but also reflects the reputation and identity of a business. Registering a brand with the Minister is the basis for brand protection so that the brand owner obtains the right to the brand to be able to use it themselves or allow other parties to use the registered brand. In practice, many trademarks have similarities in the use of design, letters, or colors with other trademarks. Disputes over similarities in brands in Indonesia include disputes between the brands Gudang Garam vs Gudang Baru, Bon Cabe vs Bon Nori, Geprek Bensu vs I Am Geprek Bensu, and Kok Tong vs Lim Kok Tong. The method used in this research is normative legal research using secondary data sources. Data were taken from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used was a literature study, where the data was processed and analysed qualitatively using a legislative approach and a case study approach. The results of this study demonstrate the need for specific legal regulations regarding trademark registration to prevent problems related to substantial similarity between registered trademarks. An analysis of judges' decisions in several cases concerning substantial similarity revealed differences in the judges' considerations in issuing rulings on trademarks with substantial similarity. Therefore, more specific legal regulations must be amended or added regarding the criteria or elements of substantial similarity for trademarks to be cancelled. In the event of cancellation of a trademark with substantial similarity, the party whose trademark is cancelled is required to cease all production or distribution of goods or services related to the cancelled trademark. Trademark cancellation, which is decided through a court decision, requires the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights to remove the cancelled registered trademark.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107052
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Theses [3144]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV