Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSaidin
dc.contributor.advisorAzwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi
dc.contributor.authorBarus, Zefanya Brigitha
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-24T06:15:15Z
dc.date.available2025-07-24T06:15:15Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107052
dc.description.abstractA brand is a sign used as an identifier for goods or services. A brand is not only a symbol and differentiator of a business but also reflects the reputation and identity of a business. Registering a brand with the Minister is the basis for brand protection so that the brand owner obtains the right to the brand to be able to use it themselves or allow other parties to use the registered brand. In practice, many trademarks have similarities in the use of design, letters, or colors with other trademarks. Disputes over similarities in brands in Indonesia include disputes between the brands Gudang Garam vs Gudang Baru, Bon Cabe vs Bon Nori, Geprek Bensu vs I Am Geprek Bensu, and Kok Tong vs Lim Kok Tong. The method used in this research is normative legal research using secondary data sources. Data were taken from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used was a literature study, where the data was processed and analysed qualitatively using a legislative approach and a case study approach. The results of this study demonstrate the need for specific legal regulations regarding trademark registration to prevent problems related to substantial similarity between registered trademarks. An analysis of judges' decisions in several cases concerning substantial similarity revealed differences in the judges' considerations in issuing rulings on trademarks with substantial similarity. Therefore, more specific legal regulations must be amended or added regarding the criteria or elements of substantial similarity for trademarks to be cancelled. In the event of cancellation of a trademark with substantial similarity, the party whose trademark is cancelled is required to cease all production or distribution of goods or services related to the cancelled trademark. Trademark cancellation, which is decided through a court decision, requires the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights to remove the cancelled registered trademark.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectTrademarken_US
dc.subjectEssential Similarityen_US
dc.subjectTrademark Cancellationen_US
dc.titlePersamaan Pada Pokoknya Dalam Sengketa Merek di Indonesia (Studi pada Beberapa Kasus Sengketa Merek di Pengadilan Niaga)en_US
dc.title.alternativeEssential Similarities in Trademark Disputes in Indonesia (A Study of Several Trademark Dispute Cases in the Commercial Courten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200199
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013026203
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001027001
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages95 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record