• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Penjatuhan Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti terhadap Korporasi yang Bukan Sebagai Terdakwa dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

    Imposing Criminal Penalties in the Payment of Substitute Money to Corporations That Are Not Defendants in Corruption Cases

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (449.8Kb)
    Fulltext (2.165Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Jufri, Jufri
    Advisor(s)
    Danil, Elwi
    Yunara, Edi
    Sukarja, Detania
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Court judges play an important role in handing down criminal verdicts in corporate corruption cases to recover state losses. This normative research discusses the imposition of substitute financial penalties, the basis for judges' considerations in imposing substitute financial penalties on corporations that are not defendants, and the concept of imposing corporate corruption penalties in the future. Conclusion: First, the imposition of a criminal penalty in the form of compensation in corruption cases can be carried out against corporations and/or their administrators if the corruption is carried out by or on behalf of the corporation. Second, the judge's consideration in imposing a replacement monetary penalty on a corporation that is not a defendant in the court decision refers to the doctrine of vicarious liability, judicial independence, facts, instruments of delicti, to provide a deterrent effect, a preventive effect, caution, justice, and protection of victims. Third, the concept of imposing a monetary penalty against a corporation that is not a defendant in the future is based on the values of social justice and the restoration of state losses rather than simply punishing people. If there is a conflict between certainty and justice, then the judge must prioritize social justice. It is hoped, firstly, that the judge will interpret the relationship between Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b and the elements in Article 20 UUPTPK in determining whether or not a corporation can be punished without fault to return state losses through compensation. Second, there needs to be control guidelines for judges for uniformity, so that corporations are not punished, but are not actually involved in corruption. Third, judges should refer to the concept of vicarious liability, even though the corporation is not the defendant but its management, if the corporation is used as an instrument of delicti, then the corporation must be sentenced to a monetary penalty.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107147
    Collections
    • Doctoral Dissertations [153]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV