Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPurba, Hasim
dc.contributor.advisorSembiring, Idha Aprilyana
dc.contributor.authorLumbantobing, Hans Marcellino Bungaran
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T04:23:09Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T04:23:09Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107443
dc.description.abstractThe need for a house must be met by every human being. This basic need was responded to by the government by issuing PP Number 64 of 2016 concerning the development of low-income housing. Therefore, business actors take advantage of this opportunity by offering housing products with a practical method, namely brochures. This offer provides convenience, however, this convenience actually provides legal light for consumers where what has been agreed upon in the Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) and brochures between the parties does not correspond to reality so that this research is formulated with the following problems: 1). How is the Regulation of the Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) With Marketing Through Brochures? 2). How is the Developer's Accountability for Mismatched Orders in the Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) With Marketing Through Brochures in Bekala Independent City Phase II? 3). What are the Legal Efforts for Consumers of Bekala Independent City Phase II Housing for Defaults Made by Developers in the Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) With Marketing Through Brochures? This type of research is empirical legal research whose data sources consist of primary data sources in the form of interviews and questionnaires to consumers and the marketing team. In addition, this research is also supported by secondary data sources in the form of literature studies, namely laws and regulations, journals, articles, theses, and legal dictionaries related to the problems studied. The results of this study indicate that there is a discrepancy in the order in the sale and purchase agreement and brochure, in this case the wall separating the house is not made, the material is not good, and the PDAM water is late in entering the housing. The Developer's responsibility is to execute each of these consumer problems. The consumer's efforts are to make a Complaint to the Developer regarding the discrepancy received. This study recommends that the Developer be more careful in making clauses in the agreement and brochure that should be in accordance with the original. Then, the Developer should immediately follow up on the damage experienced by the consumer.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectResponsibilityen_US
dc.subjectDeveloperen_US
dc.subjectSale and Purchase Agreementen_US
dc.subjectBrochureen_US
dc.titleTanggung Jawab Developer atas Ketidaksesuaian Pesanan dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Rumah Deret dengan Pemasaran Melalui Media Brosur (Studi Perumahan Kota Mandiri Bekala Tahap II)en_US
dc.title.alternativeDeveloper’s Responsibility for Non-Caompability of Orders in The Sale Purchase Agreement (PPJB) of Roof Houses with Marketing Through Brochure Media (Study of Kota Mandiri Bekala Phase II)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200568
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0003036602
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0014047609
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages160 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record