• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warna yang Diakui Sebagai Merek Dagang dalam Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Nasional Indonesia

    Analysis of the Legal Protection of Color Recognized as Trademarks in International Law and Indonesian Law

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (1.416Mb)
    Fulltext (2.489Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Tarigan, Joy Daniel
    Advisor(s)
    Leviza, Jelly
    Rizky, Fajar Khaify
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The use of color as a recognized trademark, analyzing its registration, regulation, constraints, and legal protection from the perspectives of international and Indonesian national law. As the role of color becomes increasingly vital in brand identity and competitiveness in the global market, an urgent need for harmonization and legal certainty emerges. This study employs a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach, a comparative approach, and case approach to analyze existing regulations. The findings show that under the TRIPS Agreement international law recognises protection for combinations of colours provided those combinations have distinctiveness acquired through use that can be verified through secondary meaning and provided they are not functional. Because TRIPS allows each member to decide how to apply these provisions, advanced jurisdictions such as the United States and Australia also protect single colour. A landmark decision such as Louboutin v. YSL confirms that colour marks can obtain narrowly tailored protection that balances exclusive rights with market competition. By contrast, Indonesian law in Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications mentions only arrangements of colours, which courts and examiners interpret as combinations and thus effectively bar the registration of single colours. Indonesia also lacks technical guidelines for proving secondary meaning, has no precise standard for colour representation, leaves wide discretion to examiners, and has produced little jurisprudence on the subject. This regulatory gap causes legal uncertainty for businesses and weakens Indonesia’s position in protecting nontraditional marks. The study therefore concludes that Indonesia needs regulatory reform at least through implementing regulations that explicitly recognise and govern the registration of single colour and combination of colors marks so that the legal framework provides certainty and aligns with international best practice.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107508
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Theses [2965]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV