Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNursyamsi
dc.contributor.advisorTarigan, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorSamosir, Siti Annisa
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T08:37:28Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T08:37:28Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107711
dc.description.abstractWaste is a serious issue for the environment, health, and the economy. Plastic, in particular, is a major contributor. From 1950 to 2018, global plastic production reached over 8 billion tons, with plastic bottles being one of the main contributors. To address the accumulation of plastic bottle waste, one innovative solution is to utilize it in construction products.This study investigates the effects of HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene) and PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) plastic waste as aggregate substitutes in paving blocks on mechanical properties, durability, cost, and surface morphology. Compressive strength tests showed that the control paving block (25.38 MPa). The addition of plastic waste reduced performance, with the optimal compressive strength found in 5% HDPE (21.24 MPa) and 5% PET (22.32 MPa), while the lowest was at 15% HDPE (14.62 MPa). The highest water absorption (1.36%) occurred in 5% HDPE, while the lowest was in 15% PET. An increase in plastic content reduced water absorption due to the hydrophobic nature of plastic.In the sodium sulfate resistance test, the weight difference between the control paving block and those with plastic additions was ≤1% after five soaking cycles, with no visible or structural cracks or defects. The impact test showed the best performance at 5% plastic content (withstood up to 10 blows), while the 15% plastic variation only withstood 5 blows. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) results showed that paving blocks with plastic substitution had few voids, but the plastic–aggregate bond was weak due to the smooth surface and differences in chemical properties. Economically, using plastic waste as an aggregate substitute in paving blocks reduced material costs by 1.78% and plastic waste by 7.35 kg/m². Although plastic–aggregate adhesion still needs optimization, test results indicate that plastic waste has the potential to serve as an environmentally friendly alternative material with adequate performance for sustainable paving block applications.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectPaving Blocken_US
dc.subjectPET Plastic Wasteen_US
dc.subjectHDPE Plastic Wasteen_US
dc.subjectCompressive Strengthen_US
dc.subjectCost Analysisen_US
dc.titlePemanfaatan Limbah Plastik Berjenis Hdpe dan Pet Sebagai Substitusi Agregat Terhadap Sifat Mekanik Paving Blocken_US
dc.title.alternativeUtilization of Hdpe and Pet Plastic Waste As Aggregate Substitutes On The Mechanical Properties of Paving Blocksen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM237016003
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0023067701
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0024125605
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI22101#Teknik Sipil
dc.description.pages156 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 9. Industry Innovation And Infrastructureen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record