Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBarus, Utary Maharany
dc.contributor.advisorSitepu, Faradila Yulistari
dc.contributor.authorWahyu, Muhammad
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T08:43:17Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T08:43:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107715
dc.description.abstractBusiness competition in global trade is becoming increasingly complex, making legal protection for trademarks crucial, especially for well-known marks. The registration case of the local trademark "Jollybe" which bears similarities to the internationally renowned "Jollibee" has drawn legal attention due to the principle of good faith in Indonesia's trademark registration system. This research aims to examine how the principle of good faith is regulated under Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, to analyze the legal considerations in Decision No. 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst., and to assess the legal consequences of the decision for the parties involved. This study is a normative legal research using statutory and case approaches. Data were obtained through library research consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, analyzed using descriptive qualitative techniques. Decision No. 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. is the main subject of analysis, reviewed based on applicable legal provisions and legal doctrines regarding violations of the good faith principle. The results indicate that the principle of good faith is a fundamental requirement in Indonesia’s trademark registration system. In the case of Jollibee versus Jollybe, substantial similarities were found, indicating a breach of good faith by the registrant of the Jollybe trademark. The panel of judges decided to annul the Jollybe trademark, despite its formal registration, as it was proven to be registered in bad faith and bore resemblance to the famous Jollibee mark. This decision sets an important precedent, emphasizing that protection of well-known marks takes precedence and affirming that the principle of good faith can override the first-to-file principle. The ruling affects the exclusive rights of Jollybe's trademark, strengthens Jollibee’s legal standing, and urges the Directorate General of Intellectual Property to be more rigorous in evaluating trademark registration applications. Key Word: Good Faith, Well-Known Marks, Cancellation of Trademark, Jollibee, Jollybe.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectGood Faithen_US
dc.subjectWell-Known Marksen_US
dc.subjectCancellation of Trademarken_US
dc.subjectJollibeeen_US
dc.subjectJollybeen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Yuridis Pelanggaran Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Kasus Merek Terkenal Jollibee dan Merek Lokal Jollybe (Studi Putusan No. 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Juridical Analysis of Good Faith Breach in the Dispute between the Renowned Trademark Jollibee and the Local Trademark Jollybe (Decision Studies No. 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Psten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200261
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0014017501
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0018078802
dc.description.pages133 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record