Analisis Komparatif Sumo Masa Edo dan Masa Meiji Meiji Jidai To Edo Jidai Ni Okeru Sumou No Hikaku No Bunseki

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the similarities and differences in the development of SUMO during the Edo period (1603–1868) and the Meiji period (1868–1912). Theories employed include cultural theory, historiography, social change theory, and comparative theory. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, with data collected through observation and note-taking techniques from documentary videos. The results show that SUMO during the Edo and Meiji periods shared similarities in terms of the structure of the dohyo (arena), the wrestler ranking system (banzuke), prematch rituals, and the social function of SUMO as entertainment and a cultural symbol. However, there were significant differences, such as the relocation of matches from shrine grounds to dedicated arenas, the disappearance of the dohyo’s supporting pillars, and the transformation of wrestlers' status from reliance on local patronage to professional athletes under the management of the Nihon SUMO Kyokai. Although SUMO underwent modernization during the Meiji era, it continued to preserve the traditional values of Japanese culture.