Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSembiring, Rosnidar
dc.contributor.advisorSinaga, Henry
dc.contributor.authorSaragih, Sabio Astroman
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-29T04:09:26Z
dc.date.available2025-07-29T04:09:26Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107783
dc.description.abstractLegal protection for landowners holding land title certificates is a fundamental aspect of Indonesia's land system, which is normatively guaranteed through Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles (UUPA) and Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units, and Land Registration. However, in its implementation, land disputes involving certificate holders frequently arise. This research aims to analyze three main issues: (1) How is legal certainty for landowners holding land title certificates ensured within Indonesia's land law system? (2) What are the mechanisms for resolving land disputes in cases of overlapping certificates on the same land parcel according to Indonesian legislation? (3) What are the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges in Supreme Court Decision Number 309 PK/Pdt/2021 regarding legal protection for landowners holding title certificates in overlapping certificate disputes? The research method employed is normative juridical approach conducted through literature study to obtain secondary data. The collected data is then analyzed qualitatively to gain comprehensive understanding of the legal aspects examined. The research findings indicate that legal certainty for landowners holding land title certificates in Indonesia is normatively guaranteed through UUPA and Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021, where certificates function as strong evidence. However, in practice, legal uncertainty still exists due to various factors such as land disputes, overlapping certificates, and weak supervision systems in the land registration process. The mechanism for resolving overlapping certificate disputes can be pursued through three channels: administrative resolution by the National Land Agency, resolution through general courts, and alternative dispute resolution. Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 309 PK/Pdt/2021 shows that the Panel of Judges reinforces legal protection for certificate holders who registered legitimately and in good faith by applying the principle of registration time priority, where the party who registers first has stronger rights. This decision also affirms the rejection of overlapping certificates containing legal defects to strengthen legal certainty in the land system.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectLand Title Certificateen_US
dc.subjectLand Disputesen_US
dc.subjectOverlapping Certificatesen_US
dc.titlePerlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah dalam Kasus Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda (Studi Kasus Putusan MA Nomor 309 PK/Pdt/2021)en_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Protection for Holders Land Ownership Certificates in Cases of Duplicate Certificates Disputes (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 309 PK/Pdt/2021)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM227011032
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0002026602
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0104076802
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74102#Kenotariatan
dc.description.pages146 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 4. Quality Educationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record