• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis Mekanik Sasis Urban Team Horas USU dengan Perbandingan Material Galvanized Steel dan Alumunium 6061 Menggunakan Finite Element Method

    Mechanical Analysis of the Urban Team HORAS USU Chassis with a Comparison of Galvanized Steel and Aluminum 6061 Materials Using the Finite Element Method

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (1.944Mb)
    Fulltext (5.399Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Simangunsong, Teofilus C P
    Advisor(s)
    Sabri, M
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study aims to analyze and compare the mechanical parameters of the Urban Team Horas USU vehicle chassis made of Galvanized Steel and Aluminum 6061 using the Finite Element Method (FEM). The analysis focuses on stress, strain, total deformation, and safety factor (FOS) to determine the more optimal material based on structural performance and material efficiency. Simulations were conducted using SolidWorks 2020 for 3D modeling and ANSYS 2020 R2 for numerical analysis, with a static load of 985 N. The simulation results reveal that Galvanized Steel exhibits lower total deformation (0.3119 mm) compared to Aluminum 6061 (0.88677 mm), indicating superior rigidity. Aluminum 6061 shows higher elastic strain (0.00031954 mm/mm) than Galvanized Steel (9.7896e- 5 mm/mm), reflecting greater flexibility. The maximum stress for both materials remains below their yield limits (Aluminum: 19.632 MPa, Galvanized: 18.337 MPa), with safety factors significantly exceeding standard thresholds (Aluminum: 11.098, Galvanized: ~15), suggesting potential overdesign. In conclusion, Galvanized Steel demonstrates better structural stability, while Aluminum 6061 offers lighter weight but lower stiffness. Design optimization could further refine material selection to reduce mass without compromising safety.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/107926
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Theses [963]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV