Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSiregar, Mahmul
dc.contributor.advisorSukarja, Detania
dc.contributor.authorSiregar, Elizabeth Regita Eunike
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-04T08:06:57Z
dc.date.available2025-08-04T08:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/108004
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the execution of mortgage guarantee auctions as a means of protecting the rights of banks as creditors, with a specific focus on Case Decision No. 92/Pdt.G/2022/PN Kln. The research addresses three main issues: the fairness afforded to creditors under the legal provisions governing mortgage auctions in positive law; the standard for determining the auction value of mortgaged assets as regulated by existing laws; and the extent of legal protection for the rights of banks as mortgage holders, as reflected in the aforementioned case decision. The research adopts a normative juridical method with a descriptive approach. It relies on secondary data obtained through literature reviews to produce primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Additionally, interviews with bank representatives were conducted to gain practical insights into auction execution. The data were analyzed qualitatively, focusing on the interpretation of legal texts, including statutory regulations, court decisions, and academic literature. The findings reveal that while the legal framework for mortgage auctions under positive law is clearly established, practical challenges remain—particularly in determining fair auction values—that hinder the realization of justice for creditors. Current valuation standards do not always guarantee optimal outcomes for creditors. In the case of Decision No. 92/Pdt.G/2022/PN Kln, legal protection for the bank as a creditor was implemented, though challenges persist in ensuring both legal certainty and equitable outcomes. In conclusion, although auctions serve as a legal mechanism to safeguard the rights of banks, in practice, they do not always deliver fair and optimal results. This is largely due to the complexities of auction procedures, which are more difficult in implementation than suggested by legal provisions. The study recommends revising the standards for auction valuation and strengthening the legal safeguards for creditor rights during execution.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectExecutionen_US
dc.subjectAuctionen_US
dc.subjectMortgageen_US
dc.subjectLegal Protectionen_US
dc.subjectCreditoren_US
dc.titleEksekusi Lelang Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Untuk Melindungi Hak-Hak Bank Sebagai Kreditur (Studi Putusan Nomor 92/Pdt.G/2022/PN Kln)en_US
dc.title.alternativeExecution Of Auctioning Mortgage Guarantees To Protect The Rights Of Banks As Creditors (Study Of Decision No 92/Pdt.G/2022/PN Kln)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM200200186
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0020027303
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0011098301
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages160 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 4. Quality Educationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record