Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSaidin
dc.contributor.advisorSuhaidi
dc.contributor.advisorNasution, Mirza
dc.contributor.authorMuhtaj, Majda El
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-15T01:38:57Z
dc.date.available2025-08-15T01:38:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/108135
dc.description.abstractThe Indonesian National Action Plan for Human Rights (Ranham) is a national human rights commitment that is the basis of policy and guidelines for the government [ministries/institutions/regional governments (K/L/Pemda) to implement human rights programs and actions. Ranham is a national human rights policy document that is set for a period of five years. Ranham has been running for more than two decades of government in the Reformed era since 1998 until now. Ranham has implications for the conceptualization, instrumentation and institutionalization of human rights in Indonesia. In its development, Ranham has become an integral part of the national human rights commitment throughout the period of government in the Reformed era. This dissertation uses a type of normative legal research that is prescriptive analytical in nature by prioritizing secondary data through library data, in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research data is also supported by primary data obtained from field research through interviews with selected some informants. The research approaches used is the statute approach, historical approach and conceptual approach. Data analysis is qualitative and conclusions are drawn using the deductive reasoning method. The results of the study indicate the need for Ranham regulations that are consistent with Pancasila, the 1945 UUDNRI and laws and regulations related to human rights. Ranham regulations still refer to regulations that do not strengthen the foundations of human rights promotion and protection. Ranham regulations have not been able to adapt and modernize Ranham institutions that are able to develop inclusive consultations with policy makers. The results of the study show that Ranham has been able to run for two decades, but there was no continuity of Ranham Indonesia policies, programs and activities that continued between one period and another. An adaptive, modern and sustainable Ranham is very needed with the conducting of human rights baseline study and the inclusive communication with involvement of human rights stakeholders such as NHRIs, and civil society.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectRanhamen_US
dc.subjectnational human rights systemen_US
dc.titleRekonstruksi Politik Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Di Era Reformasi (Studi Terhadap Rencana Aksi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Indonesia 1998-2021)en_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Reconstruction Of Politics Of Human Rights Law In Reformed Era (A Study Of The Indonesian National Human Rights Action Plans 1998-2021)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM208101011
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013026203
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013076207
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0026127203
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74001#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages443 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeDisertasi Doktoren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 4. Quality Educationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record