Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairi, Zulfi
dc.contributor.advisorSitepu, Faradila Yulistari
dc.contributor.authorChairunisa, Cindy
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-23T03:30:23Z
dc.date.available2025-10-23T03:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110336
dc.description.abstractThe unauthorized use and provision of musical works have become common, especially on UGC platforms. Breach occurs on UGC platforms that provide features for adding music isn’t done legally. Some platforms also allow users to upload their audio that contains protected musical works. There are so many copyright holders of musical works who feel uneasy about this. One of them is PT Aquarius Pustaka Musik. PT Aquarius Pustaka Musik filed a lawsuit against the UGC platform operator, Likee, but their lawsuit was rejected because UGC platforms aren’t considered 'trading places'. Finally, PT Aquarius Pustaka Musik with PT Aquarius Musikindo and Melly Goeslaw, filed a petition for material judicial review to the Constitutional Court regarding Article 10 and Article 114 of the Copyright Law because the phrase 'trading place' on those articles is the reason why UGC platforms can’t be sued for copyright infringement. This research discuss the influence of technology on changes in Copyright Law, existence of UGC platforms and their relation to the legal vacuum in Article 10 and Article 114 of the Copyright Law, and impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 84/PUU XXI/2023 on UGC platforms and copyright holders. The research method that used is normative legal method with statute approach, particularly towards the Copyright Law, and a case approach, namely the case between PT Aquarius Pustaka Musik, PT Aquarius Musikindo, and Melly Goeslaw with Likee which is the reason for the filing of the material test application for Article 10 and Article 114 of the Copyright Law to the Constitutional Court.. Based on the research findings, the development of technology is the main reason for the amendment of copyright laws, UGC platforms are not 'places for trade' in Article 10 and Article 114 of the Copyright Law creating a legal vacuum for UGC platforms, the partial granting of requests in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 84/PUU-XXI/2023 having a positive impact for copyright holders. Although the expansion of meaning only applied to Article 10 of the Copyright Law, Article 10 and Article 114 of the Copyright Law are bound and inseparable, so the application of Article 114 of the Copyright Law aligns with the interpretation of Article 10 of the Copyright Law. Therefore, UGC platforms can be sued for copyright infringement.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectLegal Protectionen_US
dc.subjectCopyrighten_US
dc.subjectMusical Worksen_US
dc.subjectUGC Platformen_US
dc.titlePelindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Hak Cipta Karya Musik dalam Platform Berbasis UGC (User Generated Content) (Studi Putusan MK No 84/PUU-XXI/2023)en_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Protection for Copyright Holders of Musical Works on User Generated Content (UGC) Platforms (Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision No 84/PUU-XXI/2023)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200207
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001087102
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0018078802
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages122 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record