Penjatuhan Sanksi Terhadap Anak Pada Tindak Pidana Kelalaian Yang Menyebabkan Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian
The Imposition Of Sanctions On Minors In Criminal Acts Of Negligence Causing Traffic Accidents Resulting In Death (An Analysis Of District Court Decision Number 8/Pid.Sus.Anak/2023/PN Msb and District Court Decision Number 20/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Clp)
Abstract
Traffic accidents are rampant in the community and can result in material
loss or death. The perpetrators of traffic accidents can occur in adults as well as
children. Children as perpetrators of traffic accidents, based on the provisions of
the Law on the Child Criminal Justice System, can be held criminally responsible
for their actions. The imposition of sanctions on children must also consider the
future of children. This thesis analyzes 2 decisions of the District Court judges
related to the case of a traffic accident that resulted in the death of a child as the
defendant. The problems raised in this thesis are how to regulate the criminal act
of negligence that causes a traffic accident that results in death, how are the
provisions for sanctions against children that conflict with the law according to the
criminal law of children in Indonesia, and how are the judges' considerations
regarding the imposition of sanctions on children in the crime of negligence that
causes a traffic accident that results in death in the decision of the District Court
Number 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Msb and District Court Decision Number
20/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Clp. This thesis is a normative legal research and a
legislative approach as well as a case approach. The data collected is secondary
data with literature study data collection techniques. The results of the research
obtained show that traffic accidents caused by negligence that resulted in the death
of another person are regulated in Article 310 Paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 of
2009, the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System has regulated criminal
sanctions and actions that can be imposed on children. From the 2 District Court
decisions analyzed, it was found that the judge's consideration was not appropriate,
because the judge should have been able to find an alternative punishment that did
not place the child in the LPKA.
Collections
- Undergraduate Theses [3129]
