Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPurba, Hasim
dc.contributor.advisorSembiring, Idha Aprilyana
dc.contributor.authorFauzi, Fayyaza
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T09:30:29Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T09:30:29Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110586
dc.description.abstractThe annulment of an arbitration award may be filed if there is a discrepancy, an excess beyond the claims, improper procedures, or falsified documents. Although arbitration awards are final and binding, in practice, annulment remains possible when the arbitration process is deemed inconsistent with the principles of fairness and professionalism. In this case, the annulment was sought due to alleged conflicts of interest and unprofessional conduct by the arbitrator in examining the dispute between PT HK Realtindo and the consumers. The East Jakarta District Court, whose decision was later upheld by the Supreme Court in Decision No. 665/B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024, determined that the BANI arbitration award failed to meet the principles of impartiality and integrity. Business disputes, also known as commercial disputes, are generally resolved through litigation or non-litigation means, with arbitration being the preferred choice due to its efficiency and finality. The problems formulated in this thesis are as follows: 1. What are the provisions and requirements for the annulment of an arbitration award by the District Court? 2. What are the legal consequences of the annulment of the BANI arbitration award by the District Court based on Decision No. 665/B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024? 3. What are the judges’ legal considerations in deciding the annulment of the BANI arbitration award based on Decision No. 665/B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024? This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The data sources consist of secondary data, including primary and secondary legal materials. Data were collected through literature studies and analyzed using descriptive techniques. Article 70 of the Arbitration Law stipulates that an arbitration award may be annulled if there is evidence of falsified documents, concealed documents, or deceit. The application for annulment must be filed within 30 days after the award is registered with the District Court, with the right to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court upheld the East Jakarta District Court’s decision to annul the BANI arbitration award in the dispute involving PT HK Realtindo, emphasizing the importance of arbitrator integrity. Furthermore, in Decision No. 665/B/Pdt.Sus- Arbt/2024, the Supreme Court formally accepted the appeal, rejected the objection concerning the East Jakarta District Court’s jurisdiction, and affirmed the annulment of the BANI arbitration award due to alleged conflicts of interest and unprofessional conduct by the arbitrator.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectlegal consequencesen_US
dc.subjectannulementen_US
dc.subjectarbitral awarden_US
dc.subjectcomercial disputeen_US
dc.titleAkibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Bani Oleh Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Sengketa Komersial (Studi Putusan Nomor 665/B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024)en_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Consequences of the Annulment of the Bani Arbitration Decision by the District Court in a Commercial Dispute (Study of Decision Number 665/B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200455
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0003036602
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0014047609
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages94 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record