• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Baby Care yang Sudah Didaftarkan ( Studi Putusan Nomor 89/Pdt-Sus Merek/ 2022/ PN.Niaga /Jkt.Pst)

    Resolution of the Registered Baby Care Trademark Dispute (Study of Decision Number 89/Pdt-Sus Trademark / 2022/PN.Niaga /Jkt.Pst)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (353.9Kb)
    Fulltext (703.6Kb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Gaol, Daniel Lumban
    Advisor(s)
    Saidin
    Barus, Utary Maharany
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A brand is a logo or symbol for a product of goods or services that determines the quality of a product and at the same time has the distinguishing power between one trademark of goods and services and another. A trademark as an Intellectual Property Right is basically a sign to identify the origin of goods and services (an indication of origin) from a company with goods and/or services of another company. To Know and Analyze the Settlement of Trademark Disputes That Have Been Registered Regarding Decision Number 89/PDT-SUS Trademark/ 2022/PN.NIAGA/JKT. PST). To Know and Analyze the Cancellation of the BC Baby Care Trademark Regarding Decision Number 89/PDT-SUS Trademark/ 2022/PN.NIAGA/JKT. PST Is in Accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016. To Know and Analyze the Legal Consequences of Trademarks That Have Been Registered and Canceled Regarding Decision Number 89/PDT-SUS Trademark/ 2022/PN.NIAGA/JKT. PST) Related to the Baby Care Trademark Dispute. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research type. Based on the example of the case of the use of the trademark "Baby Care", for similar products, the court finally decided to declare that the trademark was legally void for trademark registration. The legal consequence of the cancellation of trademark registration based on a court decision that has permanent legal force is the removal of the trademark in question from the General Register of Trademarks. The party that can remove a registered trademark after a court decision is the Director General of Intellectual Property by means of deletion. The certificate obtained from the trademark registration owned by the entrepreneur is ultimately no longer valid from the date of the deletion, so that it directly results in the legal protection for the rights holder also ending.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110621
    Collections
    • Master Theses [1906]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV