Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSaidin
dc.contributor.advisorBarus, Utary Maharany
dc.contributor.authorGaol, Daniel Lumban
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-05T07:27:36Z
dc.date.available2025-11-05T07:27:36Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110621
dc.description.abstractA brand is a logo or symbol for a product of goods or services that determines the quality of a product and at the same time has the distinguishing power between one trademark of goods and services and another. A trademark as an Intellectual Property Right is basically a sign to identify the origin of goods and services (an indication of origin) from a company with goods and/or services of another company. To Know and Analyze the Settlement of Trademark Disputes That Have Been Registered Regarding Decision Number 89/PDT-SUS Trademark/ 2022/PN.NIAGA/JKT. PST). To Know and Analyze the Cancellation of the BC Baby Care Trademark Regarding Decision Number 89/PDT-SUS Trademark/ 2022/PN.NIAGA/JKT. PST Is in Accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016. To Know and Analyze the Legal Consequences of Trademarks That Have Been Registered and Canceled Regarding Decision Number 89/PDT-SUS Trademark/ 2022/PN.NIAGA/JKT. PST) Related to the Baby Care Trademark Dispute. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research type. Based on the example of the case of the use of the trademark "Baby Care", for similar products, the court finally decided to declare that the trademark was legally void for trademark registration. The legal consequence of the cancellation of trademark registration based on a court decision that has permanent legal force is the removal of the trademark in question from the General Register of Trademarks. The party that can remove a registered trademark after a court decision is the Director General of Intellectual Property by means of deletion. The certificate obtained from the trademark registration owned by the entrepreneur is ultimately no longer valid from the date of the deletion, so that it directly results in the legal protection for the rights holder also ending.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectSettlementen_US
dc.subjectDisputeen_US
dc.subjectTrademarken_US
dc.titlePenyelesaian Sengketa Merek Dagang Baby Care yang Sudah Didaftarkan ( Studi Putusan Nomor 89/Pdt-Sus Merek/ 2022/ PN.Niaga /Jkt.Pst)en_US
dc.title.alternativeResolution of the Registered Baby Care Trademark Dispute (Study of Decision Number 89/Pdt-Sus Trademark / 2022/PN.Niaga /Jkt.Pst)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM227005107
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013026203
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0014017501
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74101#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages123 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record