• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis Peran Jaksa Pengacara Negara dalam Eksekusi Denda Atas Pelanggaran Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor : 10/KPPU-I/2015)

    Analysis of a State Attorney's Role in the Execution of Fine in the Violation of Law on Business Competition in Indonesia (A Study on the Ruling of KPPU (Supervisory Committee of Business Competition No. 10/KPPU-1/2015)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (439.1Kb)
    Fulltext (859.7Kb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Sigiro, Tioneni
    Advisor(s)
    Sirait, Ningrum Natasya
    Siregar, Mahmul
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Execution of fine for the violation of law on business competition with administrative sanction imposed by KPPU (Supervisory Committee of Business Competition) upon business people who violate Law No. 5/1999 is not adequately optimal; it is known by the MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) between KPPU and the Indonesian Attorney as the law enforcement. Coordination is carried out in order to ask the Indonesian Attorney to execute fine which has been difficult to do by KPPU. Boult to do by KPP ERS The research uses normative method, supported by empirical data by studying the applicable regulations and the reality which exists in society. The data are analyzed by using descriptive analytic approach. Law No. 5/1999 does not clearly regulate the implementation of executing fine so that KPPU does it only persuasively. Consequently, the performance of KPPU in carrying out the execution is not optimal. MOU between KPPU and the Indonesian Attorney about coordination in accomplishing their task and function becomes the reason for KPPU to ask legal aid concerning execution of fine on illegal offense in business competition since the suspected has not paid the fine according to Article 30, paragraph 2 of Law No. 11/2021 on the Amendment of Law No. 16/2004 on Attorney, and Article 13, paragraph 2 of PP No. 44/2021 on the Implementation of Prohibition to Practice Monopoly and Unhealthy Business Competition. Since the MOU was signed, there has been the increase in the accomplishment of fine collection. One of the successful attempts made by KPPU in its fine collection is by coordinating with the Attorney in the Ruling No. 10/KPPU-1/2015 on Allegedly Violating Article 11 and Article 19, point e of Law No. 5/1999 on Prohibition to Practice Monopoly and Unhealthy Business Competition in Imported Buffalo Trade in Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi (JABODETABEK).
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110686
    Collections
    • Master Theses [1912]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV