Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorYunara, Edi
dc.contributor.advisorMulyadi, Mahmud
dc.contributor.authorBakara, Horas Benedict Moises Hansen
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T01:40:49Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T01:40:49Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110692
dc.description.abstractThis research discusses the legal aspects of proving corporate criminal acts related to cartel and monopoly practices in Indonesia. Violations of fair competition by corporations demonstrate that business actors not only breach administrative norms but may also commit criminal acts that harm the public interest. Proving corporate involvement in such cases presents unique challenges due to complex organizational structures and the covert nature of business agreements. The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulation of evidence concerning corporate violations in cartel and monopoly cases under Indonesian law, to assess the legal strength of evidence used by the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU), and to examine the potential application of criminal law to corporations proven to engage in cartel and monopoly practices. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, supported by secondary data such as statutory regulations, literature, and KPPU decisions related to the cooking oil cartel case. The analysis focuses on the synchronization between Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), and Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 on the Handling of Corporate Criminal Cases. The findings indicate that evidence in competition law cases requires a combination of direct evidence and indirect evidence. Although direct evidence holds strong probative value, in practice, KPPU often relies on indirect evidence through price pattern analysis and market behavior. From a criminal law perspective, a corporation may be held criminally liable if the act is committed by, for, or on behalf of the corporation and provides benefits to it. Therefore, there is an urgent need to strengthen the synergy between competition law and criminal law to achieve more effective enforcement of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectEvidenceen_US
dc.subjectCorporate Crimeen_US
dc.subjectCartelen_US
dc.subjectMonopolyen_US
dc.subjectKPPUen_US
dc.titleAspek Hukum dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korporasi Terkait Kartel dan Monopoli di Indonesiaen_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Aspects in Proving Corporate Crimes Related to Cartels And Monopolies in Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200317
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0022126005
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001047403
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages151 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 4. Quality Educationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record