Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSaidin
dc.contributor.advisorLeviza, Jelly
dc.contributor.authorDamanik, Pradipta Nada
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-15T02:05:38Z
dc.date.available2025-12-15T02:05:38Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/110863
dc.description.abstractCopyright and trademark may coexist within a single court case in business practice, particularly when a trademark in the form of a painting registered by one party is later registered as a copyright by another. This situation is exemplified in the copyrigt dispute in Decision No 40/Pdt.Sus-HakCipta/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, where the lawsuit aimed to innul the copyright registratuin of a painting filed by the Defendant so that the Plaintiff could continue using the trademark without legal interference from other parties claiming copyright over the same painting used as a mark. The issues discussed in this thesis include: (1) the form of legal protection for painting works under the Copyright Law and the Trademark Law; (2) the status of copyright protection for paintings after they have been registered and used as a trademark; and (3) the legal considerations of the judge based on Decision No. 40/Pdt.Sus-HakCipta/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst related to copyright disputes that were registered while the object was first registered ad a trademark. This study employs a normative juridical approach with a descriptive- analytical nature. The data used are secondary data collected through library research and document studies, analyzed deductively to draw conclusions. The findings indicate that the Copyright Law and the Trademark Law provide distinct forms of protection for painting works according to their respective functions and characteristics. The copyright protection status of a painting after it has been registered and used as a trademark will remain automatically attached to the painting, without the need for registration. The legal considerations in Decision No. 40/Pdt.Sus-HakCipta/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst were deemed appropriate, as they ensured jsutice and legal certainty through a thorough assessment of facts, evidence, and the application of relevant statutory provisions.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectCopyrighten_US
dc.subjectTrademarken_US
dc.subjectPaintingen_US
dc.title“Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Pendaftaran Hak Cipta Lukisan yang Memiliki Kesamaan Dengan Merek Terdaftar (Studi Putusan Nomor 40/Pdt.Sus-HakCipta/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)en_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Analysis of Dispute Resolution Concerning the Registration of a Copyrighted Painting That Resembles a Registered Trademark (A Study of Court Decision No. 40/Pdt.Sus-HakCipta/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM237011033
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0013026203
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001087301
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74102#Kenotariatan
dc.description.pages140 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record