Pengaruh Penyikatan Basis Gigi Tiruan Resin Akrilik Polimerisasi Panas dengan Pasta Kombinasi Ekstrak Andaliman (Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC) dan Kulit Markisa Ungu (Passiflora edulis) terhadap Sifat Fisis
The Effect of Brushing Heat-Polymerized Acrylic Resin Denture Base with a Combination Paste of Andaliman (Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC) and Purple Passion Fruit Peel (Passiflora edulis) Extract on Physical Properties
Date
2025Author
Husna, Ananda Luthfiyyah
Advisor(s)
Angelia, Veronica
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Tooth loss can be managed using heat-polymerized acrylic resin (HPAR)
dentures, however this material has drawbacks such as porosity that increases
surface roughness of HPAR. Alkaline peroxide is a commonly used cleanser, but
long-term use may elevate roughness and cause whitening of the denture surface.
Therefore, herbal-based ingredients are increasingly preferred as safer long-term
alternatives, including andaliman, which contains quercetin, and purple passion fruit
peel, which contains acethydrazide as antifungal. This study aimed to evaluate the
effects of brushing HPAR denture base with a combination paste of andaliman
(Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC) and purple passion fruit peel (Passiflora edulis)
extract on physical properties. This laboratory experimental study used 30 HPAR
samples divided into five groups: alkaline peroxide, aquadest, and three extract
formulations (formulation 1: 5%:10%, formulation 2: 7.5%:7.5%, formulation 3:
10%:5%). Samples underwent mechanical brushing simulation equivalent to 1, 2, 3,
4, and 5 years, followed by surface roughness and color stability testing. Data were
analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA. Results showed that brushing duration and
formulation type significantly affected both parameters (p<0.05), while their
interaction was not significant (p>0.05). Formulation 1 exhibited the smallest color
change (1.580 ± 0.759), indicating the best color stability within clinically acceptable
limits (ΔE*<3.3). Formulation 3 showed a surface roughness difference of 0.095 ±
0.015 µm, still within clinically acceptable limits (<0.2 µm). Overall, formulation 1
demonstrated the most effective performance, with both surface roughness and color
stability remaining clinically acceptable.
Collections
- Undergraduate Theses [1985]
