Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHarianto, Dedi
dc.contributor.advisorAndriati, Syarifah Lisa
dc.contributor.authorPurba, Fransiskus Marulitua
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-15T01:27:51Z
dc.date.available2026-01-15T01:27:51Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/112228
dc.description.abstractThis research discusses the legal strength of debt acknowledgment letters as evidence in money lending and borrowing agreements, especially in Decision Study No. 371/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn. A debt acknowledgment letter is a deed containing a unilateral statement from the debtor regarding the obligation to pay a certain amount of money to the creditor within a certain period of time, which can be made privately or in the form of a notarial deed. The main problems in this research include, the position of a debt acknowledgment letter with a guarantee of land rights in the material security legal system in Indonesia, the legal consequences for the debtor if they default based on the debt acknowledgment letter, and an analysis of the judge's considerations regarding the legal strength of the debt acknowledgment letter in Decision No. 371/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn. The research method used in this research is a normative legal research method. The nature of the research in this study is descriptive. The approach is based on a statutory approach and a case approach. The data collection technique is by means of library research by analyzing and studying systematically supported by primary, secondary and tertiary material sources, then analyzed qualitatively by drawing conclusions deductively. Based on the research results that have been obtained, it can be concluded that debt acknowledgment letters made privately only have limited evidentiary power and cannot be executed immediately, whereas those made before a notary have executorial power, the legal consequences for debtors who are in default include obligations such as paying compensation, interest, fines, canceling the agreement, up to the execution of material guarantees, and in Decision No. 371/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn, the judge considered the debt acknowledgment letter valid as evidence, stated that the debtor was in default, and sentenced the debtor to pay the remaining debt along with material losses.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectDebt Acknowledgment Letteren_US
dc.subjectDefaulten_US
dc.subjectLending and Borrowing Moneyen_US
dc.titleKekuatan Hukum Surat Pengakuan Hutang sebagai Alat Bukti Pinjam Meminjam Uang (Studi Putusan No. 371/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn)en_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Legal Force of A Debt Acknowledgment Letter as Evidence in Money-Lending Transactions (A Case Study of Decision No. 371/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200477
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0020086905
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0011098402
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages115 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record