Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSunarmi
dc.contributor.advisorWindha
dc.contributor.authorSiregar, Anggita Amalia
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-19T03:44:25Z
dc.date.available2026-01-19T03:44:25Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/112241
dc.description.abstractBankruptcy law in Indonesia serves primarily as an instrument for ensuring legal certainty, justice, and protection for all parties involved in debt-to-credit relationship. Through the bankruptcy mechanism, the state provides a means for creditors to obtain repayment of their debts when the debtor is no longer able to fulfill their obligations. One consequence of a bankruptcy decision is the implementation of general seizure, in which all of the debtor's assets, both movable and immovable, are immediately placed in the bankruptcy estate and placed under the management of a curator. This provision is contained in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. Thesis is descriptive analytical. Descriptive is a research that attempts to describe a particular object that explains a phenomenon or event that occurs in a particular field that is obtained based on existing facts factually and accurately. Descriptive analytical means conducting analysis to the level of description by analyzing and presenting facts systematically so that they can be more easily understood and concluded. The discussion of general seizures and sale and purchase agreements (PPJB) in the context of bankruptcy in Indonesia shows that bankruptcy law has a significant impact on the rights of debtors and third parties, such as buyers who have fulfilled their payment obligations. General seizures serve to protect the interests of creditors by securing all assets of debtors who are bankrupt. However, in certain cases, as described in the Supreme Court decision No. 33PK / pdt.sus- pailit / 2021, the rights of buyers in good faith must be respected, even though the deed of sale and purchase (AJB) has not been signed. This decision confirms that buyers who have paid off and physically control the object have strong legal rights, and the curator's actions in including the assets in the bankruptcy estate are considered invalid.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Seizureen_US
dc.subjectSale and purchase agreementen_US
dc.subjectBankcrupty estaten_US
dc.titleSita Umum Terhadap Objek Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas Yang Dimasukkan Ke Dalam Boedel Pailit (Studi Putusan No.33PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021)en_US
dc.title.alternativeGeneral Attachment Over Fully-Paid Sale and Purchase Agreement Objects Included In the Bankruptcy Estate (A Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No.33PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0015026304
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0012017501
dc.identifier.nidnNIM210200589
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages114 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record