Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSuprayitno
dc.contributor.advisorTony
dc.contributor.advisorAgustining
dc.contributor.authorBeen, Devi Marlina
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T05:06:17Z
dc.date.available2022-11-04T05:06:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/53909
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT In notarizing deed in terms of reading and signing of a deed, UUJN (Notarial Act) requires not less than two witnesses referred to as instrumental witnecc. Being present in the notarization process, in the reading andsigning ofthe deed, the witness will certainly know the content o/the notarial deed because the Notary reads the content to them. Therefore, when a problem is found in the notarial deed and the deed becomes evidence during the judicial process, the witnesses are frequently asked to be the court witnesses. Thereon, questions arise as to the extent to which information can be provided by the witness certificate. There is no clear regulation as to what obligations of imtrumental witnesses nre, in conveying the information tothe investigators,general prosecutors, andthe judge; what witness’ responsibilities are, in keeping the noiarial deed confidentiality; and what legal consequences andsanctions are for the witnessif there is a potential for anymisuse, such asleakage of the notarial deed information which may result in injuring both parties and the notary. that has not been stipulated under one regulation is called legal vacuum (rechts'vacuum). The research employs normative juridical method, at the approach of sociology of few which is conducted by carefully collecting primary and secondary data through field research by conducting intewiews with relevant parties, namely the Notary and Imtrumental witnesses. The results obtained from the field indicate that Instrumental Witnesses are obligated to understand the drawing up process of notarial deeds and to make sure that the pr[ocess meets the requirements stipulated in UUJN. In the aspect of notarial deed confidentiality, although it has not been regulated in UUJN, the obligations are still attached to Instrumental Witnesses because the deed contains one’s civil rights whose confidentiafly is protected by the State. The summoning of an instrumental witness to become a witness during the court process does not pertain to the provision of UUJN if the information given is not the duties and responsibilities of the instrumental witness during notarial deed nnforizafion which are related to reading and signing of the deed They can only provide information regarding their duties stipulated Pertaining to UUJN which is to testify that the formality of deed notarisation has been fulfilled asreferred toUUJN.Ifthewitness providesinformationotherthan that, it means the notarial deed confidentiality has been breached. which certainly breaks the Law. Keywords: obligation, instrumental witness, notarial deeden_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectobligationen_US
dc.subjectinstrumental witnessen_US
dc.subjectnotarial deeden_US
dc.titleAnalisis Yuridis Tentang Kewajiban dan Tanggung Jawab Saksi Instrumenter Terhadap Proses Pembuatan Akta Notarisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM 207011018
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0101056502
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0022096108
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74101#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages143 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record