Sinkronisasi Antara Ketetapan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia mengenai Penetapan Honor Kurator dan Pengurus dengan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
View/ Open
Date
2021Author
Tambunan, Yohanes Sebastian
Advisor(s)
Sunarmi
Ginting, Budiman
Leviza, Jelly
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
ABSTRACT
Yohanes Sebastian Tambunan
Sunarmi
Budiman Ginting
Jelly Leviza
The curator and the management have completed their duties and obligations, then they are given an
honorarium. In the bankruptcy law and stipulations of the minister of law and human rights, this term
of honor is referred to as compensation for the services of the Curator and Management. However, in
the explanation of the articles of the law, the term "honor" is used. Who determines the honorarium for
the Curator/Management and in what amount is not explicitly regulated in the bankruptcy law. In
practice, since the issuance of the bankruptcy law, the panel of judges decides the amount of
honorarium for the Curator and Management, and has never guided the Decree/Regulation of the
Minister of Law and Human Rights. There are court decisions that stipulate the honorarium of the
Curator and Management which does not refer to the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human
Rights which should be binding. become a research study in this thesis. The Ministerial Regulation is
the implementing regulation of the law. The problems discussed in this study are how the legal
certainty of the honorarium of the Curator and Management in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning
Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations and the Decree of the Minister of Law
and Human Rights Number 18 of 2021, how to implement the determination of the curator's
honorarium in the decisions of the Minister of Law and Human Rights. bankruptcy decision, how to
determine the ideal curator honorarium in the bankruptcy law regulations. The research method used is
normative juridical which is defined as research that refers to legal norms contained in laws and
regulations and court decisions. Legal certainty regarding the arrangement of the honorarium for
Curators and Management is regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU,
but the nominal value of the honorarium is made in a Ministerial Regulation not regulated in Law
Number 37 of 2004, nor in Ministerial Regulation Number 18 of 2021, resulting in a legal vacuum.
Given these various conflicts, it is necessary to synchronize several regulations. In particular, it should
be more firmly regulated in the new Bankruptcy Law
Key words : Bankruptcy, Curator, Honorarium
Collections
- Master Theses [1853]