Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHarahap, Husnul Isa
dc.contributor.authorSanita, Nattaya
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-15T08:23:23Z
dc.date.available2022-11-15T08:23:23Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/60330
dc.description.abstractThis research tries to explain about the conflict that happened in election of Golkar Party Chairman of Karo Regency in 2017 and how the management of conflict resolution so that 2 people who initially try to fight over the position as Chairman finally can unite in the same stewardship. Based on the analysis results found that the management of conflict resolution by Golkar Party in election conflict Golkar Party Chairman Chairman of Karo Regency using 4 methods namely method of domination (emphasis), method of integrative settlement, authoritative command method and compromise method. However, the most influential conflict management in the settlement of Golkar Party Karo conflict is the method of domination (emphasis), the other three methods are part of the method of domination. All decisions taken by third parties (Provincial DPD) as a party with higher authority in the resolution of this conflict must be obeyed by all parties. Decision of the Provincial DPD which finally made Ferianta Purba elected as Chairman of DPD Golkar Party Karo Regency while rival Firdaus Sitepu elected as Secretary of DPD Golkar Party Karo Regency.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Partiesen_US
dc.subjectElectionsen_US
dc.subjectConflicten_US
dc.subjectConflict Managementen_US
dc.titleKonflik Internal Partai (Studi Kasus: Pemilihan Ketua Partai Golkar Kabupaten Karo 2017)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM130906078
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0031128205
dc.identifier.nikKODEPRODI67201#Ilmu Politik
dc.description.pages96 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record