Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSyahrin, Alvi
dc.contributor.advisorAblisar, Madiasa
dc.contributor.advisorMulyadi, Mahmud
dc.contributor.authorMarzuki, Rusdi
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-08T02:24:17Z
dc.date.available2022-12-08T02:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/71276
dc.description.abstractResearch and investigation is one of the Polri's duties for the community, because the Police is formed from the community and work for the community, the Police must be Professional, Modern and Trusted (Promoter). In this case, environmental crime investigations are carried out through stages of investigation, prosecution, examination, and settlement and submission of case files. The essence of investigation in the field of environment is done by gathering information (Pulbaket) and making Investigative Results Report by expert. Based on Article 96 of Law no. 32 of 2009 on the Control and Management of the Environment, the legal evidence in the environmental crime suit consists of testimony of witnesses, experts, letters, instructions, statements of the accused, and I or other evidence. Other evidence is what is referred to as scientific evidence. Reports I Letters made by experts may be referred to as scientific evidence. Scientific evidence is necessary because in the proof of environmental crime cases generally have difficulty in the presentation and determination of causality relationships. Environmental proofs are often confined to the presentation of facts and evidence tools that are often scientific (scientific proof) and involve company secrets. Moreover, if a company suspected of carrying out environmental offenses of more than one amount and disposing of waste containing the same elements, especially those that are chemical and related to Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which affirms the verdict shall be proved by two valid evidences. This research is a normative juridical analysis descriptive research. The type of data used is secondary data derived from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Secondary data were collected by literature study technique. Furthermore, the data are analyzed by using qualitative analysis method . . . . The results of the research indicate that: Preferably, researcher and investigators of Subdit IV/Tipidter Dit.Reskrimsus North Sumatra Police added by doing recruitment, education and training; It is advisable that the Subdit IV/Tipidter Dit.Reskrimsus North Sumatra Regional Police optimize the use of scientific evidence; And preferably, researcher and investigators often hold scientific discussions on the judges' judgment in the environmental field.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectThe use of scientific evidenceen_US
dc.subjectresearches and investigationsen_US
dc.subjectand enforcement of environmental law in the territory of North Sumatra Police. Vllen_US
dc.titlePenggunaan Scientific Evidence dalam Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup di Wilayah Polda Sumuten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM157005136
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0031036302
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0008046103
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001047403
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74101#ILMUHUKUM
dc.description.pages159 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record