Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNasution, Bismar
dc.contributor.advisorSitepu, Runtung
dc.contributor.advisorSunarmi, Sunarmi
dc.contributor.authorHutabarat, Jujur
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T03:57:32Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T03:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/72555
dc.description.abstractRecently the administration and management of State-Owned Enterprise got much public attention because the manageiment applied is reparded of being unprofessional, inefficient, not transparent and not accountable thatthe government spend more money to Keep it exist Public evaluation of the performance of the Board of Management of State-Owned Enterprise brings up questions of what causes the performance of the Board of Management of State-Owned Enterprise in managing the company inefficient and not optimal; what the position, role and responsibility of the Board of Management of State-Owned Enterprise in managing, the company ar; and whether or not the intemal regulations made by the Board of Management of State-Owned Enterprise is regarded valid and exising legislation or as a part of the Constitutional Lave In managing the company, the Board of Management of State-Owned Enterprise is bound to the legislation regulate in Law No. 19/2003 in connection with Law No11995, the Statutes of the Limited Compary and the Decision made in the Stakeholders” General Meeting (RUPS) Which are in accordance with the existing legislations. In one side, the existence of Law No.1772003 raises the unclear and problematical regulation in managing. of State-Owned Enterprise because the definition of state finance stated in Law No, 17/2003 ines the state property which is separated from the Budget of State Revenue and Expenditure included in State- Owned Enterprise. Law upholders always look at public intrest in handling any case occured in a Stat-Owned Enterprise. Even though the Supreme Court issued its insteuction on August 16,2006 then followed withthe Letter of State Minister of State-Owned Enterprise conceming the separation ofthe asses of th State from those belongs tothe StateOwned Enterprise, the law upholder sill do not change their public inferest-based perception. ‘This situation results in. confusion” and ‘uncertainty in the administration and management of State-Owned Enterprise tht the Board of Management cannot focus and optimally manage the business of State-Owned Enterprise. Feling afraid of being chased by th law upholders becomes a constraint in developing the State-Owned Enterprise business activites. The exstonce and management of State-Owned Enterprise a8 a busines entity isnot maximal in the attempt to gain big profit as expected and demanded bythe government asa sharcholder that finally the contribution of State-Owned Enterprise expected by the community asthe motor and. motivator forthe national economy is less fet and enjoyed by the community themselves.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectLimited Company Managementen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara dalam Pengurusan Perseroanen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM047005067
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0029035603
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0010105622
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0015026304
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74101#ILMUHUKUM
dc.description.pages256 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record