| dc.description.abstract | Technology and communication improvement has caused
Economic activity is not hampered by national borders anymore. One
country sovereignty on regulation economic system, politic and law will be
lessen when another country’s economic interest is disturbed by it.
Difference in understanding, disagreement, or conflict cannot be ignored
until it is getting worsen ang have to be solved sooner in most satisfaction
way for all parties. Business conflict solving usually classified info two
different way, which are diplomatic way and using law institution. Conflict
solving through ADR that most know and being people interest recently, is
arbitration way. It felt by people related to commerce field as most
beneficial way than using law institution, because guarantee the conflict
situation secrecy by not publishing the decision result, and in other side
the conflict can be solved in very short time. This research aimed to know
the role of Pengadilan Negeri (Public Court Institution) in conducting
national arbitration; to know the obstacles within arbitration process in
Indonesia based on Regulation Number 30. 1999.
The method used is descriptive method that explain and describe
Jaw force of arbitration’s decision in business conflict solving based on
Regulation Number 30. 1999 related to the role of public Court Institution
as executor then its various law sources.
The result shows that execution involved Public Court, which its
status is ca he operates, influenced significantly by the existence of Public
Court's Head, because arbitration decision can be applicated if the head
command it. | en_US |
