| dc.description.abstract | Law as a regulator of all existing points of view, both from
activities carried out by a person, or carried out by institutions. Even the
law also regulates the actions of a person's behavior with the actions he
does and the effects received from these actions. Such as the perpetrators
of corruption committed by public officials, such as members of the DPR,
governors, mayors, and regents as well as intellectual figures from several
political parties. Such behavior makes the country's financial stability
worse. In fact, almost everyone does not feel ashamed to bear the title as a
suspect/accused in a corruption case, so it is almost not wrong if someone
mentions that corruption has become entrenched in Indonesia.
Based on the background above, there are identification of
problems, namely First, how are the conditions for imposing additional
criminal sanctions in the form of revocation of political rights against
perpetrators of corruption related to public office. Second, how is the
implementation of additional criminal law in the revocation of political
rights against perpetrators of corruption related to public office. Third,
how is the analysis of the judges' considerations in imposing additional
penalties in the form of revocation of political rights against perpetrators
who abuse public office in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the
Republic of Indonesia Number: 1195 K/Pid. Sus/2014.
The research used is a normative juridical research method, namely
this type of research is a normative juridical research and is descriptive
analytical using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach. The data
sources used in this research are secondary data consisting of primary legal
materials, secondary materials and tertiary legal materials. The data
collection method is library research and to further develop this research.
Research using qualitative data analysis methods based on assumptions
about reality. And analyze the Decision of the Supreme Court of the
Republic of Indonesia Number: 1195 K/Pid. Sus/2014. And the corruption
law and human rights law.
The point of all the problems is about the revocation of political
rights such as active voting rights and passive rights in general elections
held based on statutory regulations, in fact it can be a deterrent for
convicts of criminal acts of corruption while at the same time creating fear
for public officials and other politicians to not commit the crime of
corruption with the modus operandi of using power and office facilities.
The imposition of criminal sanctions on perpetrators of criminal acts of
corruption who use political power and are sentenced to additional penalties in the form of revocation of political rights is a good effort by
law enforcers in tackling the rise of corruption. | en_US |
