Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHarahap, M. Yahya
dc.contributor.authorHarahap, Nurhayati
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T02:48:26Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T02:48:26Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/81643
dc.description.abstractSupposition as one of the proofs in terms of positive laws, there has not still yet an agreement on the both existance and application among theorists and practicians. As with in jurisdictional practices, judges seldom used and noted obviously it in their considerations, even though ani authentication value they have used for the basic of decision making was obviously associated with their supposition. In general, they took a supposition by relating either one. evidence to another or by relating any events to the facts submitted in a court. To describe all the above mentioned case the writer conducted an analytical descriftive research. The character is empirical with juridis normative approach. The location of the research was in Medan Civil Court.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectSuppositionen_US
dc.subjectLaw Contracten_US
dc.titleAlat Bukti Persangkaan dalam Hukum Kontrak dan Penerapannya di Pengadilan Negeri Medanen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM933105019
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74101#ILMUHUKUM
dc.description.pages187 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record