Alat Bukti Persangkaan dalam Hukum Kontrak dan Penerapannya di Pengadilan Negeri Medan
dc.contributor.advisor | Harahap, M. Yahya | |
dc.contributor.author | Harahap, Nurhayati | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-13T02:48:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-13T02:48:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/81643 | |
dc.description.abstract | Supposition as one of the proofs in terms of positive laws, there has not still yet an agreement on the both existance and application among theorists and practicians. As with in jurisdictional practices, judges seldom used and noted obviously it in their considerations, even though ani authentication value they have used for the basic of decision making was obviously associated with their supposition. In general, they took a supposition by relating either one. evidence to another or by relating any events to the facts submitted in a court. To describe all the above mentioned case the writer conducted an analytical descriftive research. The character is empirical with juridis normative approach. The location of the research was in Medan Civil Court. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | id | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Sumatera Utara | en_US |
dc.subject | Supposition | en_US |
dc.subject | Law Contract | en_US |
dc.title | Alat Bukti Persangkaan dalam Hukum Kontrak dan Penerapannya di Pengadilan Negeri Medan | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.identifier.nim | NIM933105019 | |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI74101#ILMUHUKUM | |
dc.description.pages | 187 Halaman | en_US |
dc.description.type | Tesis Magister | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Master Theses [1852]
Tesis Magister