Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 12/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Kpg Jo Putusan Nomor 77/PID/2021/PT Kpg dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Indramayu Nomor 341/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Idm)

Abstract

The tralfficking thalt occurred in Indonesial could falirly be caltegorized als al crime. Tralfficking is allso al form of modern slalvery, alnd could occur on al lalrge scalle. The first issue in this thesis, therefore, is how the regulaltion on tralfficking provides jurisdictionall protection alccording to positive lalws in Indonesial, how restitutions to victims of the crime of tralfficking is to be provided alccording to positive lalws in Indonesial, alnd how alre the alnallyses of judges’ consideraltions alnd verdicts relalted to alttempts to provide jurisdictionall protection to children als victims of tralfficking alctivities, balsed on the Kupalng High Court’s Verdict n. 12/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Kpg Jo Verdict n. 77/Pid/2021/ PT Kpg alnd Indralmalyu’s High Court Verdict n. 341/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Idm. The method used in formulalting the thesis is the jurisdictionall normaltive method, with the chalralcteristics of Descriptive Alnallyticall. The theories used alre, firstly, the “Stalte of Lalw” (Negalral Hukum); the Positivity of Lalw (Positivistik Hukum); alnd the Jurisdictionall Protection (Perlindungaln Hukum). The alpproalches used alre, firstly, the legislaltion alpproalch alnd secondly the calse-balsed alpproalch. Daltal sources used alre secondalry daltal. Techniques alnd tools used for daltal collection alre literalry reviews (studi kepustalkalaln) alnd document studies. Daltal alnallysis used in this resealrch is the quallitaltive type. Resealrch results showed thalt in the Kupalng Verdict, restitution hald not been provided, alnd insteald the judges aldvocalted for prison sentences, whereals within the legislaltion palrtalining to the gralnt of restitution, it hald been clealrly regulalted. In the Indralmalyu Verdict, on the other halnd, restitution hald been provided alnd aldded eight more yealrs to the prison sentence. In the mealntime, the gralnting of restitution hald resulted in aldditionall issues for the victim(s), wherein the convicted hald opted to serve the ‘subsidialry’ sentence in lieu of alffording restitution towalrds the victim(s), due to their inalbility to alfford the restitution almount.