| dc.description.abstract | In this study, the corruption case focuses on the regulation of credit distribution at state owned banks with the legal entity of a Limited Liability Company (PT). The bank appointed was
Bank BNI '46 related to the fictitious credit case An. Boy Hermansyah (BY) who until now has not
been tried until now, while the associated officials of Bank BNI '46 have been tried and have
received a court decision with permanent legal force. In fact, some of the defendants from Bank
BNI '46 committed suicide, due to severe depression, because they were about to be detained. The
case stems from the existence of credit disbursement in 2009, amounting to Rp. 129 billion made
by a businessman from Aceh, Boy Hermansyah. The defendant in this case, namely: Defendant
D.A., is the Former Leader of the BNI '46 Business Marketing Group Cab. Medan Youth,
Defendant R.D., as the Former Leader of the BNI '46 Middle Credit Center (SKM) Cab. Medan
Youth and Defendant T.I., as Former Relationship BNI '46 SKM Pemuda Medan. The credit
intended for the plantation business was not according to its designation; the assets that were
pledged as collateral were also problematic. The disbursed funds are not used for business
activities as stated. In the calculations, it was later discovered that the State suffered a loss of Rp.
117.5 billion and the public prosecutor assessed the involvement of the three defendants in the
fictitious credit case.
As for the legal issues raised in this thesis research, namely: regarding the regulation of
credit distribution at state-owned banks with the legal entity of Limited Liability Companies (PT);
disbursement of credit that gives rise to criminal acts of corruption in state-owned bank PT; and
the distribution of credit that led to criminal acts of corruption at Bank BNI'46 Pemuda Medan
Branch. This study aims to analyze corruption crimes against the fictitious credit case of Bank
BNI '46 Cab. The Medan youth.
This type of research is normative research, with the nature of descriptive analysis
research. The approach used is the statutory approach. The data is sourced from secondary data
which is called the source of legal material. The court's decision was obtained from the Registrar
of the Corruption Court at the Medan District Court. Data were collected using library research
and field research techniques. Data collection tools are in the form of document studies, while
field data are collected by in-depth interviews without using interview guidelines.
The results of the study show that: 1) The regulation of credit distribution at Bank BNI'46
Pemuda Medan Branch, basically must comply with the company's internal provisions. The
company's internal provisions do not include statutory regulations, where violations of the
"against the law" element in the Anti-Corruption Law must be interpreted as violating the law in
a formal sense; 2) Credit disbursement that causes corruption at Bank BNI'46 Pemuda Medan
Branch, the most important thing is that it must meet the element of "against the law in a formal
sense", namely as stipulated in the laws and regulations in the banking sector, namely the
application of the prudential banking principle. as mandated by Article 2 of the Banking Law.
Only then is it associated with criminal acts of corruption as referred to in Article 2 paragraph
(1) and Article 3, or even Article 5 and Article 12A of the Anti-Corruption Law, so that the
distribution of credit can be categorized as a criminal act of corruption; and 3) Medan District
Court Corruption Decisions No. 79, 80, and 81/Pid.Sus.K/2012/PN.Mdn., dated 29 April 2013
which has permanent legal force (inkracht) is not a criminal act of corruption, but only a case of
bad credit at PT. Bank BNI'46 Pemuda Medan Branch with its customer PT. BDL. | en_US |
