Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMulia, Ahmad Perwira
dc.contributor.advisorHasibuan, Gina Cynthia Raphita
dc.contributor.authorNuriaman, Nuriaman
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-25T01:35:04Z
dc.date.available2023-07-25T01:35:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/85956
dc.description.abstractMaintenance of 9 Irrigation Areas with a total area of 1,042 Ha in the Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) Region III of the Water Resources, Highways and Construction Development Services of Deli Serdang Regency could not be carried out all, due to limited funds due to budget refocusing. This study aims to analyze the dominant criteria that need to be considered in determining irrigation area maintenance priorities so that prioritization is not only limited to deliberations and suggestions from the community but has clear criteria, as well as analyzing the priority order of irrigation area maintenance using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) through a questionnaire. to selected respondents and the Point Allocation (PA) method as a comparison. The criteria reviewed are irrigation performance criteria (physical infrastructure, crop productivity and personnel organization), area size criteria (large, medium, and small area), funding source criteria (PAD, DAU, and DAK), and budget target criteria (resilience food, and improvement of irrigation services). The results of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) show that the budget target criteria are the dominant criteria that need to be considered with a value of 0.33. While the dominant sub-criteria that need to be considered from each criterion are the physical infrastructure sub-criteria (0.55), large area sub-criteria (0.47), special allocation funds sub-criteria (0.41), and food security sub-criteria (0.60). The first order of priority for irrigation area maintenance is D.I Jati Baru with a weight of 0.143. For the second to ninth priority in a row are D.I Pertumbuk, D.I Sei Tuan, D.I Johar Baru, D.I Kotasan, D.I Jaharum B, D.I Tj. Garbus Kampung, D.I Tanjung Siporkis, and D.I Kampung Melayu. As a comparison, the Point Allocation (PA) method gives results that are not much different from the first order of priority for maintenance of irrigation areas, namely D.I Jati Baru with a weight of 0.149. For the second to ninth priority in a row are D.I Pertumbuk, D.I Johar Baru, D.I Jaharum B, D.I Sei Tuan, D.I Kotasan, D.I Tj. Garbus Kampung, D.I Tanjung Siporkis, D.I Kampung Melayu.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectPriorityen_US
dc.subjectmaintenanceen_US
dc.subjectirrigation areaen_US
dc.subjectcriteriaen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectSDGsen_US
dc.titlePenentuan Prioritas Pemeliharaan Daerah Irigasi Akibat Refocussing Anggaran Menggunakan AHP (Studi Kasus Wilayah UPTD III Kabupaten Deli Serdang)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM207016011
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0017046604
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0010108906
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI22101#Teknik Sipil
dc.description.pages231 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record