• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Kedudukan Direksi Dalam Mewakili Perusahaan Dalam Perkara Kepailitan (Studi Perkara No.3/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2020/PN NIAGA MDN)

    View/Open
    Fulltext (1.477Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Author
    Suryapranata, Adji
    Advisor(s)
    Sunarmi
    Azwar, Tengku Keizeirina Devi
    Harianto, Dedi
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The organs of a limited liability company have their own respective function and authority. It is not uncommon that they deny their responsibility for representing the company in the case of bankruptcy in the Commercial Court. The research problems are as follows: how about the regulation on the position of the Directors to represent the company in the process of hearing in the Request for Bankruptcy in the Commercial Court, how about the procedure of removal from the office of Directors and the other company's organs which have the impact on the management's authority to represent the company in the process of hearing in requesting for bankruptcy n the Commercial Court, and how about the judge's consideration and decision in determining the authority of the Directors and the other company's organs to represent the company in the process of hearing in the case of bankruptcy, based on the Verdict No. 3/Pdt.Sus-Paillt/2020/PN Niaga Mdn The research employs descriptive juridical normative method. The data are obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. It is written by using regulations and other legal materials related to the topic of the research. The result of the research shows that the Directors who have the authority to represent the company in the hearing in bankruptcy. They can be altered by the Board of Commissioners or the other parties that are appointed by RUPS. The Directors dismissal should be based on laws and the company's Articles of Association. There are two kinds of Directors' dismissal: suspension and permanent dismissal, according to Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Company In the case No. 3/Pdt. Sus-Pallit/2020 PN Niaga Man, the Board of Commissioners argumentation that the Directors who have been dismissed doo not have the right anymore to represent PT Berkah Mulia Beton cannot be proved before the Court; therefore, the Directors of PT Berkah Mulia Beton C:\Users\PTSP1\Downloads\translate 2.png authority to represent the company in the case of bankruptcy.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/86303
    Collections
    • Master Theses [1850]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV