Penerapan Ketentuan Pasal 108 Junto Pasal 68 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Studi terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Balige Nomor 194/Pid.B/LH/2021/PN Blg Lingkungan Hidup)

Date
2023Author
Sitindaon, Gilbeth Abiet Nego
Advisor(s)
Syahrin, Alvi
Yunara, Edi
Mulyadi, Mahmud
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The criminal act of burning land is accommodated in several laws and
regulations. The imposition of criminal sanctions on the perpetrators of land burning
in the Decision of the Balige District Court Judge Number 194/Pid.B/LH/2021/PN
Blg is not optimal because it imposes sanctions under a minimum penalty. The Panel
of Judges in trying the case of the criminal act of land burning is considered to have
damaged the values contained in legal certainty. There is a basis and guideline for
judges in making decisions under minimum punishment.
This research is a normative legal research type and is supported by
primary data in the form of interviews from Judges at the Balige District Court. This
research is a descriptive analysis which analyzes and explains something that is done
in a way that does not go outside the scope of the problem and is based on a general
theory or concept. The approach used in this study is the statutory approach and the
case approach.
The conclusion in this study is that the provisions for the criminal act of
burning land are regulated in Article 108 of the PPLH Law in conjunction with
Article 69 paragraph (1) of the PPLH Law which is a formal offense. The application
of criminal law to perpetrators in the crime of land burning is related to the
provisions of article 108 in conjunction with article 69 paragraph (2) of Law Number
32 of 2009 Concerning Environmental Protection and Management in the Decision
of the Balige District Court Judge Number 194/Pid.B/LH/2021 /PN Blg is based on
the sociological aspects of actors who continue to survive by farming, besides that
there is a conflict of norms. It can be said that the decision of the Panel of Judges at
the Balige District Court Number 194/Pid.B/LH/2021/PN.Blg does not fulfill a sense
of justice. The verdict of the panel of judges in this case and the demands put forward
by the prosecutor are even less than 1/3 of the criminal sanctions stipulated in the
Forestry Law, Environmental Law and Plantation Law.
The recommendation in this study is, with the regulation of forest and/or
land burning, it is hoped that law enforcers will be more assertive in handling cases
related to forests and/or land. Norm conflicts between laws and regulations
governing the issue of forest and land burning must be resolved immediately in order
to create legal certainty
Collections
- Master Theses [1849]